From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from ffbox0-bg.mplayerhq.hu (ffbox0-bg.ffmpeg.org [79.124.17.100]) by master.gitmailbox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A717484B7 for ; Tue, 5 Dec 2023 14:59:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [127.0.1.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ffbox0-bg.mplayerhq.hu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D06568CEC6; Tue, 5 Dec 2023 16:59:33 +0200 (EET) Received: from nef.ens.fr (nef2.ens.fr [129.199.96.40]) by ffbox0-bg.mplayerhq.hu (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D5E5E68C515 for ; Tue, 5 Dec 2023 16:59:26 +0200 (EET) X-ENS-nef-client: 129.199.129.80 ( name = phare.normalesup.org ) Received: from phare.normalesup.org (phare.normalesup.org [129.199.129.80]) by nef.ens.fr (8.14.4/1.01.28121999) with ESMTP id 3B5ExQ6q005700 for ; Tue, 5 Dec 2023 15:59:26 +0100 Received: by phare.normalesup.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 15775E6C30; Tue, 5 Dec 2023 15:59:26 +0100 (CET) Date: Tue, 5 Dec 2023 15:59:26 +0100 From: Nicolas George To: FFmpeg development discussions and patches Message-ID: References: <20231202155352.4680-1-anton@khirnov.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.4.3 (nef.ens.fr [129.199.96.32]); Tue, 05 Dec 2023 15:59:26 +0100 (CET) Subject: Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] lavc: remove the QOA decoder X-BeenThere: ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: FFmpeg development discussions and patches List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: FFmpeg development discussions and patches Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: ffmpeg-devel-bounces@ffmpeg.org Sender: "ffmpeg-devel" Archived-At: List-Archive: List-Post: Vittorio Giovara (12023-12-05): > I'm not bickering, That is exactly what you do. > actively include testing as part of the bare minimum process to accept the > patch/review is harming the whole generation of developers. I agree that Paul's attitude is utterly toxic to the project, but Anton's attitude of removing features is way worse. At least Paul almost only pollutes his own code. As for harming a whole generation, it is the same vague argument used by everybody to condemn anything they do not like, like homosexuality for example, and that argument is always the same level of bullshit. -- Nicolas George _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-devel-request@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".