Anton Khirnov (12023-12-02):
> Its author not only failed to add any tests, as is required by the
> development rules, but continues to actively refuse to do so.
> 
> Untested decoders are worse than useless, so remove it.

Only tested manually ≠ untested.

A code that works is better than no code at all.

We are not libav, we do not remove code just because the Great Dictator
says so. If you really really want this decoder to have a test, you can
write add it yourself.

Rejected.

-- 
  Nicolas George