Vittorio Giovara (12023-11-06):
> Nice try but pointing out your logical fallacies is not being rude, but
> rather is just showing you how easily your message can be misinterpreted,

You have done nothing of the sort. You have just misrepresented my
words, showing that you decided to barge into a conversation without
knowing its details.

>	    And yes, asking for time when you yourself do not provide a
> timeline is equivalent to vetoing a patch (indefinitely too, since you
> yourself say you "will review this issue when [you] have the time", which
> could very well be never).

And now you are accusing me of outright dishonesty. Better and better.

> I feel like, once again, we've exhausted this topic

You have exhausted because you barged in without knowing the first thing
about it.

> Please justify your objections to the proposed solution,

I have already done so, but again you neglected to read it: if there is
a bug, it is in the framework code.

-- 
  Nicolas George