From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from ffbox0-bg.mplayerhq.hu (ffbox0-bg.ffmpeg.org [79.124.17.100]) by master.gitmailbox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F27947DF0 for ; Fri, 27 Oct 2023 12:54:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [127.0.1.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ffbox0-bg.mplayerhq.hu (Postfix) with ESMTP id BDE1E68CB11; Fri, 27 Oct 2023 15:54:01 +0300 (EEST) Received: from nef.ens.fr (nef2.ens.fr [129.199.96.40]) by ffbox0-bg.mplayerhq.hu (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3304A68C965 for ; Fri, 27 Oct 2023 15:53:54 +0300 (EEST) X-ENS-nef-client: 129.199.129.80 ( name = phare.normalesup.org ) Received: from phare.normalesup.org (phare.normalesup.org [129.199.129.80]) by nef.ens.fr (8.14.4/1.01.28121999) with ESMTP id 39RCrrBs031144 for ; Fri, 27 Oct 2023 14:53:53 +0200 Received: by phare.normalesup.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 61AD8EB5C0; Fri, 27 Oct 2023 14:53:53 +0200 (CEST) Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2023 14:53:53 +0200 From: Nicolas George To: FFmpeg development discussions and patches Message-ID: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.4.3 (nef.ens.fr [129.199.96.32]); Fri, 27 Oct 2023 14:53:53 +0200 (CEST) Subject: Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] avfillter/buffersrc: activate and EOF fix X-BeenThere: ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: FFmpeg development discussions and patches List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: FFmpeg development discussions and patches Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: ffmpeg-devel-bounces@ffmpeg.org Sender: "ffmpeg-devel" Archived-At: List-Archive: List-Post: Paul B Mahol (12023-10-27): > Subject: [PATCH 1/2] avfilter/buffersrc: switch to activate > > Signed-off-by: Paul B Mahol > --- > libavfilter/buffersrc.c | 25 ++++++++++++++++--------- > 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) What would be the benefit? > if (s->eof) > - return AVERROR(EINVAL); > + return AVERROR_EOF; > AVERROR_EOF does not have a semantic for writing, only for reading, so no. Regards, -- Nicolas George _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-devel-request@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".