From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from ffbox0-bg.mplayerhq.hu (ffbox0-bg.ffmpeg.org [79.124.17.100]) by master.gitmailbox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 50A8847AFD for ; Mon, 2 Oct 2023 10:06:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [127.0.1.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ffbox0-bg.mplayerhq.hu (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC05868CCE6; Mon, 2 Oct 2023 13:06:43 +0300 (EEST) Received: from nef.ens.fr (nef2.ens.fr [129.199.96.40]) by ffbox0-bg.mplayerhq.hu (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 74FEF68CBFF for ; Mon, 2 Oct 2023 13:06:37 +0300 (EEST) X-ENS-nef-client: 129.199.129.80 ( name = phare.normalesup.org ) Received: from phare.normalesup.org (phare.normalesup.org [129.199.129.80]) by nef.ens.fr (8.14.4/1.01.28121999) with ESMTP id 392A6abu010359 for ; Mon, 2 Oct 2023 12:06:36 +0200 Received: by phare.normalesup.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id B0E03E007C; Mon, 2 Oct 2023 12:06:36 +0200 (CEST) Date: Mon, 2 Oct 2023 12:06:36 +0200 From: Nicolas George To: FFmpeg development discussions and patches Message-ID: References: <20230923164344.GG3543730@pb2> <169589690228.6638.9407962520356451750@lain.khirnov.net> <20230928192835.GZ3543730@pb2> <8C40F2AB-FC79-4009-808F-07105E953687@remlab.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <8C40F2AB-FC79-4009-808F-07105E953687@remlab.net> X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.4.3 (nef.ens.fr [129.199.96.32]); Mon, 02 Oct 2023 12:06:37 +0200 (CEST) Subject: Re: [FFmpeg-devel] SDR lib comments X-BeenThere: ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: FFmpeg development discussions and patches List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: FFmpeg development discussions and patches Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Errors-To: ffmpeg-devel-bounces@ffmpeg.org Sender: "ffmpeg-devel" Archived-At: List-Archive: List-Post: R=E9mi Denis-Courmont (12023-09-29): > First, I don't *represent* any downstream. I just happen to be one of > several maintainers of one such project. And you write here about them: you decide to represent them. > In my experience, > what you claim as obvious (I'd call it the Lua approach to open-source > development) would be considered obviously bad if not outright toxic > behaviour in most projects and by most developers. Maybe these projects do not have the same mindset of history than ffmpeg. That does not prove I am wrong. -- = Nicolas George _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-devel-request@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".