From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from ffbox0-bg.mplayerhq.hu (ffbox0-bg.ffmpeg.org [79.124.17.100]) by master.gitmailbox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 514BE47A01 for ; Fri, 29 Sep 2023 07:03:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [127.0.1.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ffbox0-bg.mplayerhq.hu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4588468CBAD; Fri, 29 Sep 2023 10:03:22 +0300 (EEST) Received: from nef.ens.fr (unknown [129.199.96.40]) by ffbox0-bg.mplayerhq.hu (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D686F68CAC6 for ; Fri, 29 Sep 2023 10:03:15 +0300 (EEST) X-ENS-nef-client: 129.199.129.80 ( name = phare.normalesup.org ) Received: from phare.normalesup.org (phare.normalesup.org [129.199.129.80]) by nef.ens.fr (8.14.4/1.01.28121999) with ESMTP id 38T73Dom015107 for ; Fri, 29 Sep 2023 09:03:14 +0200 Received: by phare.normalesup.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id DCCBCEB5BD; Fri, 29 Sep 2023 09:03:13 +0200 (CEST) Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2023 09:03:13 +0200 From: Nicolas George To: FFmpeg development discussions and patches Message-ID: References: <20230923164344.GG3543730@pb2> <169589690228.6638.9407962520356451750@lain.khirnov.net> <20230928192835.GZ3543730@pb2> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.4.3 (nef.ens.fr [129.199.96.32]); Fri, 29 Sep 2023 09:03:14 +0200 (CEST) Subject: Re: [FFmpeg-devel] SDR lib comments X-BeenThere: ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: FFmpeg development discussions and patches List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: FFmpeg development discussions and patches Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Errors-To: ffmpeg-devel-bounces@ffmpeg.org Sender: "ffmpeg-devel" Archived-At: List-Archive: List-Post: R=E9mi Denis-Courmont (12023-09-29): > And as a downstream OSS application developer, I'd really rather > postproc be officially and properly dropped, so I can justify dropping > it downstream as well. Let me get this straight? You COULD just add --disable-postproc in your downstream project and be done with it, but you would rather that FFmpeg removes the feature (granted, of limited use, but still of use to some people) so that you do not take the blame for removing it? Well, I think this makes it obvious why I think people representing downstream projects should have very little influence on the future of FFmpeg. -- = Nicolas George _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-devel-request@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".