From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from ffbox0-bg.mplayerhq.hu (ffbox0-bg.ffmpeg.org [79.124.17.100]) by master.gitmailbox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 869AB47772 for ; Thu, 21 Sep 2023 19:05:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [127.0.1.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ffbox0-bg.mplayerhq.hu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 10F1468C809; Thu, 21 Sep 2023 22:05:01 +0300 (EEST) Received: from nef.ens.fr (nef2.ens.fr [129.199.96.40]) by ffbox0-bg.mplayerhq.hu (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7B6BB68C6E0 for ; Thu, 21 Sep 2023 22:04:55 +0300 (EEST) X-ENS-nef-client: 129.199.129.80 ( name = phare.normalesup.org ) Received: from phare.normalesup.org (phare.normalesup.org [129.199.129.80]) by nef.ens.fr (8.14.4/1.01.28121999) with ESMTP id 38LJ4sGU018144 for ; Thu, 21 Sep 2023 21:04:55 +0200 Received: by phare.normalesup.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id B25FFE007C; Thu, 21 Sep 2023 21:04:54 +0200 (CEST) Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2023 21:04:54 +0200 From: Nicolas George To: FFmpeg development discussions and patches Message-ID: References: <20230410221428.GJ1164690@pb2> <20230921162138.GP8640@pb2> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.4.3 (nef.ens.fr [129.199.96.32]); Thu, 21 Sep 2023 21:04:55 +0200 (CEST) Subject: Re: [FFmpeg-devel] FFmpeg release 6.1 (SDR Plans) X-BeenThere: ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: FFmpeg development discussions and patches List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: FFmpeg development discussions and patches Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: ffmpeg-devel-bounces@ffmpeg.org Sender: "ffmpeg-devel" Archived-At: List-Archive: List-Post: Vittorio Giovara (12023-09-21): > What about other developers' time for maintenance? Yes, what about it? How much time did YOU spend maintaining libavfilter or libavdevice? Zero. How much time will you spend maintaining SDR? Zero. What does it change for you and everybody who thinks like you? NOTHING. Michael wants to invest his time in a features that integrates beautifully in FFmpeg and that some users are glad to expect. That is a good thing. People who are not interested in it but have no practical arguments against it have absolutely no right to oppose or put so much roadblock it becomes discouraging just because they would like it better if Michael spent his time on things that they find useful rather than things that he finds fun. > And for users installing a library nowadays is a one liner, not really a > big deal Only if it is packaged by a distribution. I am guessing you are not volunteering to package it yourself, so you are again proposing to waste somebody else's time. -- Nicolas George _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-devel-request@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".