From: Nicolas George <george@nsup.org> To: FFmpeg development discussions and patches <ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org> Subject: Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH 2/8] lavu: new AVWriter API Date: Tue, 2 May 2023 18:53:43 +0200 Message-ID: <ZFFAF1ZhJqNA78wc@phare.normalesup.org> (raw) In-Reply-To: <3106500.VeKRRRbgAb@basile.remlab.net> [-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1948 bytes --] Rémi Denis-Courmont (12023-05-02): > Indirecting the printf function seems pretty pointless. The last thing you Please re-read the code, there is no other way of obtaining a va_list from an actual argument than making a call to a vararg function. > want are different implementations of printf() with different limitations. And > it makes writing different backends needlessly complex, while you could just > use vasprintf(). > > Typically, with this kind of abstraction, only the raw bytes writing is > abstracted away. Examples include funopen() and fopencookie(). > > As for hypothetical use cases whence vasprintf() wouldb e "too slow", then > should not use printf()-style or function pointers to begin with. Besides if > you _really_ want to avoid the heap allocation, you can also use fopencookie() > on systems that provide it or equivalent. Being portable and not doing dynamic allocation are two major points of the design, so you will excuse me if I pass on that suggestion. > That sounds like it belongs in whichever backend actually wants to heap- > allocate the output buffer, not the frontend. There is nothing about heap allocation in this code. And if code can be in the framework common to all backends, then it is where it belongs, not duplicated in each backend. > This is an abstraction inversion (and also highly inefficient) + what I noted > above. See above, it is necessary. (If you think it is not, try doing better.) > This is an analogue of puts/fputs, not "print". This is an analogue of puts, fputs and print, and I decided to call it print. > Same problems and overengineering as above. I think you are missing something important about the purpose of this code, but I cannot guess what exactly. Please be more detailed about why you think it is overengineered and point how you would do it simpler. Thanks for the comments. -- Nicolas George [-- Attachment #1.2: signature.asc --] [-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --] [-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 251 bytes --] _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-devel-request@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-05-02 16:53 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2023-04-28 9:55 [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH 1/8] lavu: add macros to help making future-proof structures Nicolas George 2023-04-28 9:55 ` [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH 2/8] lavu: new AVWriter API Nicolas George 2023-04-28 10:37 ` Rodney Baker 2023-04-28 11:20 ` Nicolas George 2023-05-02 15:53 ` Rémi Denis-Courmont 2023-05-02 16:53 ` Nicolas George [this message] 2023-05-02 18:29 ` Rémi Denis-Courmont 2023-05-02 18:36 ` Nicolas George 2023-05-02 18:46 ` Rémi Denis-Courmont 2023-05-02 18:47 ` Nicolas George 2023-04-28 9:55 ` [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH 3/8] lavu/writer: add test Nicolas George 2023-04-28 9:55 ` [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH 4/8] lavf/dump: use a writer Nicolas George 2023-04-28 9:55 ` [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH 5/8] lavu: add a JSON writer API (WIP) Nicolas George 2023-04-29 9:11 ` Nicolas George 2023-04-29 9:41 ` Anton Khirnov 2023-04-29 14:06 ` James Almer 2023-04-29 17:17 ` Nicolas George 2023-04-29 15:06 ` Derek Buitenhuis 2023-04-30 0:29 ` Kieran Kunhya 2023-05-01 6:20 ` Vittorio Giovara 2023-04-29 17:11 ` Nicolas George 2023-04-29 18:27 ` Anton Khirnov 2023-04-29 18:33 ` Nicolas George 2023-05-01 6:57 ` Leo Izen 2023-05-01 9:51 ` Nicolas George 2023-05-01 10:18 ` Jean-Baptiste Kempf 2023-04-30 15:06 ` Michael Niedermayer 2023-04-30 21:51 ` Kieran Kunhya 2023-05-01 9:46 ` Nicolas George 2023-04-28 9:55 ` [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH 6/8] lavu: add JSON writer test (WIP) Nicolas George 2023-04-28 9:55 ` [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH 7/8] lavf/options: add av_disposition_write() Nicolas George 2023-04-28 9:55 ` [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH 8/8] lavf/dump: use av_disposition_write() Nicolas George 2023-04-29 8:17 ` [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH 1/8] lavu: add macros to help making future-proof structures Anton Khirnov 2023-04-29 15:11 ` Derek Buitenhuis 2023-05-02 15:36 ` Rémi Denis-Courmont 2023-05-02 16:42 ` Nicolas George 2023-05-02 18:31 ` Rémi Denis-Courmont 2023-05-02 18:38 ` Nicolas George
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=ZFFAF1ZhJqNA78wc@phare.normalesup.org \ --to=george@nsup.org \ --cc=ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Git Inbox Mirror of the ffmpeg-devel mailing list - see https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel This inbox may be cloned and mirrored by anyone: git clone --mirror https://master.gitmailbox.com/ffmpegdev/0 ffmpegdev/git/0.git # If you have public-inbox 1.1+ installed, you may # initialize and index your mirror using the following commands: public-inbox-init -V2 ffmpegdev ffmpegdev/ https://master.gitmailbox.com/ffmpegdev \ ffmpegdev@gitmailbox.com public-inbox-index ffmpegdev Example config snippet for mirrors. AGPL code for this site: git clone https://public-inbox.org/public-inbox.git