From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from ffbox0-bg.mplayerhq.hu (ffbox0-bg.ffmpeg.org [79.124.17.100]) by master.gitmailbox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 496FB4BF52 for ; Thu, 6 Mar 2025 16:43:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [127.0.1.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ffbox0-bg.mplayerhq.hu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 992B568F21C; Thu, 6 Mar 2025 18:43:30 +0200 (EET) Received: from nef.ens.fr (nef2.ens.fr [129.199.96.40]) by ffbox0-bg.mplayerhq.hu (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7F59668E7CD for ; Thu, 6 Mar 2025 18:43:23 +0200 (EET) X-ENS-nef-client: 129.199.129.80 ( name = phare.normalesup.org ) Received: from phare.normalesup.org (phare.normalesup.org [129.199.129.80]) by nef.ens.fr (8.14.4/1.01.28121999) with ESMTP id 526GhMwi002167 for ; Thu, 6 Mar 2025 17:43:22 +0100 Received: by phare.normalesup.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 7CE682EFE5; Thu, 6 Mar 2025 17:43:22 +0100 (CET) Date: Thu, 6 Mar 2025 17:43:22 +0100 From: Nicolas George To: FFmpeg development discussions and patches Message-ID: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.4.3 (nef.ens.fr [129.199.96.32]); Thu, 06 Mar 2025 17:43:22 +0100 (CET) Subject: Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH v2 0/3] avutil/log: Replace addresses in log output with simple ids X-BeenThere: ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: FFmpeg development discussions and patches List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: FFmpeg development discussions and patches Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: ffmpeg-devel-bounces@ffmpeg.org Sender: "ffmpeg-devel" Archived-At: List-Archive: List-Post: Soft Works (HE12025-03-06): > It is the GitGitGadget system which does this this automatically. Your choice to use that thing, your responsibility to not let it misbehave. > But I have removed you now and try to remove you again each time when you reply. Do not Cc other people either if they did not ask for it. > Isn't it rather wasting people's time when letting them review the > first patchset even when knowing that V2 is substantially different? When you already know a V3 is coming, yes, of course it is wasting people's time. -- Nicolas George _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-devel-request@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".