From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from ffbox0-bg.mplayerhq.hu (ffbox0-bg.ffmpeg.org [79.124.17.100]) by master.gitmailbox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C09AA4BDFF for ; Mon, 3 Feb 2025 20:46:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [127.0.1.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ffbox0-bg.mplayerhq.hu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 029D368B412; Mon, 3 Feb 2025 22:45:58 +0200 (EET) Received: from nef.ens.fr (nef2.ens.fr [129.199.96.40]) by ffbox0-bg.mplayerhq.hu (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E6E5F68AFBF for ; Mon, 3 Feb 2025 22:45:56 +0200 (EET) X-ENS-nef-client: 129.199.129.80 ( name = phare.normalesup.org ) Received: from phare.normalesup.org (phare.normalesup.org [129.199.129.80]) by nef.ens.fr (8.14.4/1.01.28121999) with ESMTP id 513Kjtaw022606 for ; Mon, 3 Feb 2025 21:45:55 +0100 Received: by phare.normalesup.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id A81E42EFDF; Mon, 3 Feb 2025 21:45:55 +0100 (CET) Date: Mon, 3 Feb 2025 21:45:55 +0100 From: Nicolas George To: FFmpeg development discussions and patches Message-ID: References: <20250129203321.GB4991@pb2> <20250130004313.GB17613@haasn.xyz> <9dacff42-0536-4736-922b-0d791d63ef61@gmail.com> <20250201004948.GH4991@pb2> <64fdd98f-23ed-45ca-943e-011f223d20f9@gmail.com> <20250201215325.GT4991@pb2> <45c37d06-f49b-42ff-a841-64cfaa513af4@gmail.com> <20250203191416.GA4991@pb2> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20250203191416.GA4991@pb2> X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.4.3 (nef.ens.fr [129.199.96.32]); Mon, 03 Feb 2025 21:45:55 +0100 (CET) Subject: Re: [FFmpeg-devel] Democratization work in progress draft v2 X-BeenThere: ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: FFmpeg development discussions and patches List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: FFmpeg development discussions and patches Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: ffmpeg-devel-bounces@ffmpeg.org Sender: "ffmpeg-devel" Archived-At: List-Archive: List-Post: Michael Niedermayer (12025-02-03): > Lets assume we have 2 projects in one the vulnerability was taken advantage of > while in the other it was not. > > How would you tell them apart ? One of them would have a software-defined radio subsystem, the other not. Regards, -- Nicolas George _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-devel-request@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".