From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from ffbox0-bg.mplayerhq.hu (ffbox0-bg.ffmpeg.org [79.124.17.100]) by master.gitmailbox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 37FD24AA14 for ; Tue, 21 Jan 2025 07:17:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [127.0.1.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ffbox0-bg.mplayerhq.hu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 90F3C68B37C; Tue, 21 Jan 2025 09:17:47 +0200 (EET) Received: from nef.ens.fr (nef2.ens.fr [129.199.96.40]) by ffbox0-bg.mplayerhq.hu (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A5E9F68049F for ; Tue, 21 Jan 2025 09:17:40 +0200 (EET) X-ENS-nef-client: 129.199.129.80 ( name = phare.normalesup.org ) Received: from phare.normalesup.org (phare.normalesup.org [129.199.129.80]) by nef.ens.fr (8.14.4/1.01.28121999) with ESMTP id 50L7HdCK005649 for ; Tue, 21 Jan 2025 08:17:40 +0100 Received: by phare.normalesup.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id CFE042EFE0; Tue, 21 Jan 2025 08:17:39 +0100 (CET) Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2025 08:17:39 +0100 From: Nicolas George To: FFmpeg development discussions and patches Message-ID: References: <20250121012624.GC4991@pb2> <20250121023804.GE4991@pb2> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20250121023804.GE4991@pb2> X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.4.3 (nef.ens.fr [129.199.96.32]); Tue, 21 Jan 2025 08:17:40 +0100 (CET) Subject: Re: [FFmpeg-devel] Regarding Git Tooling X-BeenThere: ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: FFmpeg development discussions and patches List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: FFmpeg development discussions and patches Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: ffmpeg-devel-bounces@ffmpeg.org Sender: "ffmpeg-devel" Archived-At: List-Archive: List-Post: Michael Niedermayer (12025-01-21): > The contributor looks in MAINTAINERS and sees if there is a preferred place to > submit a patch(set) to. What if the patch series affects areas handled by multiple maintainers? What if the patch would benefit from the expertise of another developer than the maintainer? Having two systems in parallel in practice does not allow anybody to use only the one they like: in practice it forces everybody to use both. That is terrible. Regards, -- Nicolas George _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-devel-request@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".