From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from ffbox0-bg.mplayerhq.hu (ffbox0-bg.ffmpeg.org [79.124.17.100]) by master.gitmailbox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 02050403B4 for ; Sat, 23 Jul 2022 13:28:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [127.0.1.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ffbox0-bg.mplayerhq.hu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1EF5168B6E6; Sat, 23 Jul 2022 16:28:56 +0300 (EEST) Received: from nef.ens.fr (nef2.ens.fr [129.199.96.40]) by ffbox0-bg.mplayerhq.hu (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3A0B168B58E for ; Sat, 23 Jul 2022 16:28:49 +0300 (EEST) X-ENS-nef-client: 129.199.129.80 ( name = phare.normalesup.org ) Received: from phare.normalesup.org (phare.normalesup.org [129.199.129.80]) by nef.ens.fr (8.14.4/1.01.28121999) with ESMTP id 26NDSmZZ002502 for ; Sat, 23 Jul 2022 15:28:48 +0200 Received: by phare.normalesup.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 5C8EBEB5B9; Sat, 23 Jul 2022 15:28:48 +0200 (CEST) Date: Sat, 23 Jul 2022 15:28:48 +0200 From: Nicolas George To: FFmpeg development discussions and patches Message-ID: References: <32p7s1q2-7prs-1189-49p4-30n507437p2@vanv.qr> MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <32p7s1q2-7prs-1189-49p4-30n507437p2@vanv.qr> X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.4.3 (nef.ens.fr [129.199.96.32]); Sat, 23 Jul 2022 15:28:48 +0200 (CEST) Subject: Re: [FFmpeg-devel] ABI break in 5.1 X-BeenThere: ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: FFmpeg development discussions and patches List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: FFmpeg development discussions and patches Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============7531273710221313673==" Errors-To: ffmpeg-devel-bounces@ffmpeg.org Sender: "ffmpeg-devel" Archived-At: List-Archive: List-Post: --===============7531273710221313673== Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="JkwXgykV9Y3KFRjJ" Content-Disposition: inline --JkwXgykV9Y3KFRjJ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Jan Engelhardt (12022-07-23): >=20 > This is a follow-up to a topic that was already raised earlier, > http://ffmpeg.org/pipermail/ffmpeg-devel/2020-July/265694.html=20 >=20 > The same has now happened to 5.0->5.1. I do not see an issue. What issue do you see? Regards, --=20 Nicolas George --JkwXgykV9Y3KFRjJ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAEBCgAdFiEE6ooRQGBoNzw0KnwPcZVLI8pNxgwFAmLb940ACgkQcZVLI8pN xgz4ixAAuQLisU6q+oJzAVaiSkVtWoeOzIa2gBjxnmObFdCyCWyw17ad8lUxR8qG 5Tv87JC/b7vPW92rI2doTuu4xlQwB2X9eb8GxkCWIgMVx2g7FlVPqBCXMgWbG/pU y9tjHYggGmj7CkrlQeu7tuecFdLmILz3i84sF3fMUGtNoBv5w+1Tll/3AuD7Kco8 /sgGBbk0IiN/RmOO8LrDHrpKU/34WEcAryHwA5HlCsdSQG1xd1/6/q1RqCbZjgxc DtYfKujog9/mMdGwQY32OU25JAE0cqPkcl/dO/6BeWUdhvVz5CC00qzj3jybkwRa 1mBlrmiM1Xcvy0QHn0DTAX2us8dlgsxf7w0HcIRRKWfk5rw7YQogbljFBobtzXqU 4shbo9PrSWOchoCiY5YYK5sMAttvtxJJ4xsajVq3EVpPJr73fQBknh1ZBxzjj7FC PK9GQ+i1AakifD+HhKjldElohceXMPlJZgHy7nB7iT3wuoFpht26bwbUVijuXCUh na4hgNFty0VDXRZ1uD6CmGJHeYJf2ItWl4Q60g/B8mjzTBBxj7/PjtdJozxfIZBQ fP2jjUwgnW+gpBzfQsojFNKtO+VE/NgZ4vwowfoF2tUSwICID4l4PCQqjydPd1/e sf2P6LzL+nBs+wYdOnJlfeedpp5Va+yt+2xS8jneCSS7iEHOgto= =tvZR -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --JkwXgykV9Y3KFRjJ-- --===============7531273710221313673== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-devel-request@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe". --===============7531273710221313673==--