From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from ffbox0-bg.mplayerhq.hu (ffbox0-bg.ffmpeg.org [79.124.17.100]) by master.gitmailbox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 12347438B9 for ; Sat, 2 Jul 2022 19:17:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [127.0.1.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ffbox0-bg.mplayerhq.hu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C70068B862; Sat, 2 Jul 2022 22:17:26 +0300 (EEST) Received: from nef.ens.fr (nef2.ens.fr [129.199.96.40]) by ffbox0-bg.mplayerhq.hu (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 785F968B7BA for ; Sat, 2 Jul 2022 22:17:19 +0300 (EEST) X-ENS-nef-client: 129.199.129.80 ( name = phare.normalesup.org ) Received: from phare.normalesup.org (phare.normalesup.org [129.199.129.80]) by nef.ens.fr (8.14.4/1.01.28121999) with ESMTP id 262JHIkd010509 ; Sat, 2 Jul 2022 21:17:18 +0200 Received: by phare.normalesup.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 54783E00E9; Sat, 2 Jul 2022 21:17:18 +0200 (CEST) Date: Sat, 2 Jul 2022 21:17:18 +0200 From: Nicolas George To: FFmpeg development discussions and patches Message-ID: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.4.3 (nef.ens.fr [129.199.96.32]); Sat, 02 Jul 2022 21:17:18 +0200 (CEST) Subject: Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH v5 00/25] Subtitle Filtering 2022 X-BeenThere: ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: FFmpeg development discussions and patches List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: FFmpeg development discussions and patches Cc: Michael Niedermayer , Andriy Gelman , Andreas Rheinhardt Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: ffmpeg-devel-bounces@ffmpeg.org Sender: "ffmpeg-devel" Archived-At: List-Archive: List-Post: Soft Works (12022-07-02): > The duplication has always existed already between audio and video > filters. You could have unified and eliminated that duplication for > years, but you didn't. I have been preparing for it for years. You did not help. > Even when I would follow that demand, it wouldn't be reasonable, > because in that case, the patchset would dramatically widen its > scope and start affecting audio and video as well - which is much > too huge to get it tackled in a single patchset. We will not accept a bad patch just because you have bitten more than you could chew and reverted to a quick and dirty solution. -- Nicolas George _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-devel-request@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".