From: Nicolas George <george@nsup.org> To: FFmpeg development discussions and patches <ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org> Subject: Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] lavfi: get rid of FF_INTERNAL_FIELDS Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2023 22:16:00 +0100 Message-ID: <Y9mFEPkpyVrf106V@phare.normalesup.org> (raw) In-Reply-To: <GV1P250MB0737BA8CA5A2D2ECA97452698FD09@GV1P250MB0737.EURP250.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM> [-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3000 bytes --] Andreas Rheinhardt (12023-01-31): > Details please. I was not going to spend time explaining unless I had assurance it was because the issue of requiring changes in the internal implementation and developers habits just to hide some fields was taken into account. Coming from somebody else, I would have expected the question to be only to find the first excuses to shoot the proposal down. But you more or less found the same ideas I did anyway. > I can only think of the following: > a) Allow the use of -fms-extensions. This allows structs with tags and > typedefs thereof to be used as unnamed struct members with the members > of the unnamed structure being treated as members of the enclosing > structure. One could then use a pointer to the big internal structure > internally and one does not need to remember whether a field is internal > or not. There is still a problem, though: One needs to cast from > AVFilterContext.(inputs|outputs). This should be done via dedicated > inlined getters, but this is a bit more typing. E.g. > "input_from_ctx(ctx, i)" instead of "ctx->inputs[i]". Of course, it > might also be shorter if someone has a short name. > GCC, Clang, MSVC and the IIRC the intel compilers support this. > > b) Add a big #define AVFILTERLINK in avfilter.h that expands to the > public part of AVFilterLink and change the declaration of AVFilterLink > to "struct AVFilterLink { AVFILTERLINK };" and use declare the internal > struct via > "struct FilterLinkInternal { > AVFILTERLINK > /* actual internal fields */ > };" > This has the downside of actually being an aliasing violation and of > adding considerable ugliness to avfilter.h, in particular during > deprecations (like with FF_API_OLD_CHANNEL_LAYOUT -- you can't check via > #if in the implementation of a macro). I also don't know whether it > plays nicely with tools that deal with source code annotations. Or use a “#include "avfilter_link_internal_fields.h" instead of a macro. > c) Wrap the internal part in an #ifdef HAVE_AV_CONFIG_H, optionally > using #if defined(HAVE_AV_CONFIG_H) && defined(BUILDING_avfilter). > d) Same as c), but strip this stuff from installed headers. > > I consider b)-d) as inferior to a), which I consider superior to Anton's > proposal, but the big drawback is its reliance on a compiler extension. Once and for all: If the solution requires changing things in the internal implementation C files and changing the habits of the people who work on these files (that goes together), then it is inferior to a solution that does not require that. Your solution (a) has this flaw, plus relies on an extension that is probably not available on all supported platforms (Microsoft I am looking at you). My favor goes to (d). Probably with a stricter test for the (c) part because the internal fields are not necessary for the filters and therefore could be hidden there too. Regards, -- Nicolas George [-- Attachment #1.2: signature.asc --] [-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --] [-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 251 bytes --] _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-devel-request@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-01-31 21:16 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2023-01-30 12:29 Anton Khirnov 2023-01-30 12:32 ` Paul B Mahol 2023-01-30 12:40 ` Nicolas George 2023-01-31 13:50 ` Anton Khirnov 2023-01-31 14:03 ` Nicolas George 2023-01-31 14:14 ` Paul B Mahol 2023-01-31 14:32 ` Nicolas George 2023-01-31 14:50 ` Paul B Mahol 2023-01-31 14:18 ` Anton Khirnov 2023-01-31 14:31 ` Nicolas George 2023-01-31 15:24 ` Anton Khirnov 2023-01-31 16:13 ` Nicolas George 2023-01-31 16:34 ` Nicolas George 2023-01-31 21:02 ` Andreas Rheinhardt 2023-01-31 21:16 ` Nicolas George [this message] 2023-02-01 0:31 ` Andreas Rheinhardt 2023-02-01 7:47 ` Nicolas George 2023-02-01 13:48 ` Andreas Rheinhardt 2023-02-03 14:45 ` Nicolas George 2023-02-04 11:09 ` Uoti Urpala 2023-02-04 15:27 ` Andreas Rheinhardt
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=Y9mFEPkpyVrf106V@phare.normalesup.org \ --to=george@nsup.org \ --cc=ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Git Inbox Mirror of the ffmpeg-devel mailing list - see https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel This inbox may be cloned and mirrored by anyone: git clone --mirror https://master.gitmailbox.com/ffmpegdev/0 ffmpegdev/git/0.git # If you have public-inbox 1.1+ installed, you may # initialize and index your mirror using the following commands: public-inbox-init -V2 ffmpegdev ffmpegdev/ https://master.gitmailbox.com/ffmpegdev \ ffmpegdev@gitmailbox.com public-inbox-index ffmpegdev Example config snippet for mirrors. AGPL code for this site: git clone https://public-inbox.org/public-inbox.git