From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from ffbox0-bg.mplayerhq.hu (ffbox0-bg.ffmpeg.org [79.124.17.100]) by master.gitmailbox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 36AED44ED7 for ; Wed, 28 Dec 2022 16:22:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [127.0.1.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ffbox0-bg.mplayerhq.hu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 247D068B88C; Wed, 28 Dec 2022 18:22:43 +0200 (EET) Received: from nef.ens.fr (nef2.ens.fr [129.199.96.40]) by ffbox0-bg.mplayerhq.hu (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 85D2D68B371 for ; Wed, 28 Dec 2022 18:22:36 +0200 (EET) X-ENS-nef-client: 129.199.129.80 ( name = phare.normalesup.org ) Received: from phare.normalesup.org (phare.normalesup.org [129.199.129.80]) by nef.ens.fr (8.14.4/1.01.28121999) with ESMTP id 2BSGMZ1r001996 for ; Wed, 28 Dec 2022 17:22:35 +0100 Received: by phare.normalesup.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 3669FEB5B7; Wed, 28 Dec 2022 17:22:35 +0100 (CET) Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2022 17:22:35 +0100 From: Nicolas George To: FFmpeg development discussions and patches Message-ID: References: <20221227214033.GS3806951@pb2> MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.4.3 (nef.ens.fr [129.199.96.32]); Wed, 28 Dec 2022 17:22:35 +0100 (CET) Subject: Re: [FFmpeg-devel] Would a crypto file be acceptable? X-BeenThere: ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: FFmpeg development discussions and patches List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: FFmpeg development discussions and patches Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============2502629076124433119==" Errors-To: ffmpeg-devel-bounces@ffmpeg.org Sender: "ffmpeg-devel" Archived-At: List-Archive: List-Post: --===============2502629076124433119== Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="6cCmg25DJv6wc8JH" Content-Disposition: inline --6cCmg25DJv6wc8JH Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Mark Gaiser (12022-12-28): > There's definitely multiple things going on but it's not what you summari= ze. You forgot the bit where =E2=80=9CMU=E2=80=9D told you your proposal was mo= stly redundant, too limited and ad-hoc and would have security implications if more generic, and =E2=80=9CDEV=E2=80=9D conveniently ignored it. --=20 Nicolas George --6cCmg25DJv6wc8JH Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAEBCgAdFiEE6ooRQGBoNzw0KnwPcZVLI8pNxgwFAmOsbUkACgkQcZVLI8pN xgxyDw/+N3UpO0wPgijxY0yNuJZ0yw2YpfC/hPSF4D5xv5qc6rtA+WA3mIhmXWkd +BRuRGGa8KuFTTBEyXJMpVl1+Q3a4Td8y4g4qvG1UiUHUm6EUW2obtM2rw1masX7 gGZVR8mEPU5uAo+twvvT8Dc27qv0jpnffu/lqlAleOhjsh9LtyRWRu19p9Pw5XHA 6Yb/QXjNklT6kbg/SFLbGHKsL7hwjVnWu1u0GzRXBz+MxeYs15YfengNAQudMsbT Aoyhc5Z6WFQy+2AKDclBXz8wXQta3V2umP4sxqVMsJQJr3EZrPbBsDs6pkgv/aTc wvQr4XpSCUN/aRfuTOoZvIN7PkG6FGyYmR3VGs89xAxEFUnaffKTKWLhT4p0Taj2 yf3VJZr9hWQruK+s1aZSSlmY4KkdavrjSZXXqn903ftTwMadS7qNU0ltilMZDJkM 9ijhs7d86DOTvKt1JkAifSLm3+JLpCVaCyFEXRNyVNbQe73WAdvA9n3FjkTUxa3P KJxCevIh2zDoNlYERyNv4dknaPFitJCKkUvHrCqkjAHCfEx0JlLieUn3X+FmdT1t sBK1p4oHLaJSfQPfuP0Cpy+EMrdfQrcRoL6pZkOsl8UNMLJxju69ctzWwl4txTDC 3qkhd11qCGQvNrvxoc+NTzgKj1B3EnueoDp0gYQyZpyPHLRqRIA= =ZpDE -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --6cCmg25DJv6wc8JH-- --===============2502629076124433119== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-devel-request@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe". --===============2502629076124433119==--