From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from ffbox0-bg.mplayerhq.hu (ffbox0-bg.ffmpeg.org [79.124.17.100]) by master.gitmailbox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47E16445AE for ; Mon, 19 Dec 2022 13:46:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [127.0.1.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ffbox0-bg.mplayerhq.hu (Postfix) with ESMTP id A863F68B724; Mon, 19 Dec 2022 15:46:05 +0200 (EET) Received: from nef.ens.fr (nef2.ens.fr [129.199.96.40]) by ffbox0-bg.mplayerhq.hu (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A221068B461 for ; Mon, 19 Dec 2022 15:45:59 +0200 (EET) X-ENS-nef-client: 129.199.129.80 ( name = phare.normalesup.org ) Received: from phare.normalesup.org (phare.normalesup.org [129.199.129.80]) by nef.ens.fr (8.14.4/1.01.28121999) with ESMTP id 2BJDjxXk006149 for ; Mon, 19 Dec 2022 14:45:59 +0100 Received: by phare.normalesup.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 01C31EB5B7; Mon, 19 Dec 2022 14:45:58 +0100 (CET) Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2022 14:45:58 +0100 From: Nicolas George To: FFmpeg development discussions and patches Message-ID: References: <7407e74b181e4e00a7b7104fb63cf56a@huawei.com> <8112CCA9-23E1-4008-A8DC-85F9534FC45B@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <8112CCA9-23E1-4008-A8DC-85F9534FC45B@gmail.com> X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.4.3 (nef.ens.fr [129.199.96.32]); Mon, 19 Dec 2022 14:45:59 +0100 (CET) Subject: Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] fftools/ffmpeg_ffplay_ffprobe_cmdutils: add -mask_url to replace the protocol address in the command with the asterisk (*) X-BeenThere: ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: FFmpeg development discussions and patches List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: FFmpeg development discussions and patches Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: ffmpeg-devel-bounces@ffmpeg.org Sender: "ffmpeg-devel" Archived-At: List-Archive: List-Post: Marvin Scholz (12022-12-19): > I agree, but then the docs should probably mention that to not give a false > sense of absolute security here. And maybe note that it might Indeed, documentation is necessary. > be a better option to pass the password via stdin or hide the process > from other users to completely avoid leaking the password. Unfortunately, as far as I know, we do not have any mechanism of the kind. That would be useful. Regards, -- Nicolas George _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-devel-request@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".