From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from ffbox0-bg.mplayerhq.hu (ffbox0-bg.ffmpeg.org [79.124.17.100]) by master.gitmailbox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ADF5D43AED for ; Tue, 21 Feb 2023 07:43:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [127.0.1.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ffbox0-bg.mplayerhq.hu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6FBF468C0A5; Tue, 21 Feb 2023 09:42:59 +0200 (EET) Received: from nef.ens.fr (nef2.ens.fr [129.199.96.40]) by ffbox0-bg.mplayerhq.hu (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9099A68BDBB for ; Tue, 21 Feb 2023 09:42:52 +0200 (EET) X-ENS-nef-client: 129.199.129.80 ( name = phare.normalesup.org ) Received: from phare.normalesup.org (phare.normalesup.org [129.199.129.80]) by nef.ens.fr (8.14.4/1.01.28121999) with ESMTP id 31L7gp3O030229 for ; Tue, 21 Feb 2023 08:42:52 +0100 Received: by phare.normalesup.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id BB4C1EB5BB; Tue, 21 Feb 2023 08:42:51 +0100 (CET) Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2023 08:42:51 +0100 From: Nicolas George To: FFmpeg development discussions and patches Message-ID: References: <20230221002516.25784-1-rcombs@rcombs.me> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20230221002516.25784-1-rcombs@rcombs.me> X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.4.3 (nef.ens.fr [129.199.96.32]); Tue, 21 Feb 2023 08:42:52 +0100 (CET) Subject: Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH 1/3] lavc/codec.h: add AV_CODEC_CAP_SINGLE_SUB_RECT X-BeenThere: ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: FFmpeg development discussions and patches List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: FFmpeg development discussions and patches Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: ffmpeg-devel-bounces@ffmpeg.org Sender: "ffmpeg-devel" Archived-At: List-Archive: List-Post: rcombs (12023-02-20): > --- > doc/APIchanges | 3 +++ > libavcodec/codec.h | 5 +++++ > libavcodec/version.h | 2 +- > 3 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) And... No change to the framework to make use of this flag? Like, return AVERROR(EINVAL) if the flag is present but several rectangles are given? Regards, -- Nicolas George _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-devel-request@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".