Re: [FFmpeg-devel] Pushing without approval avfilter/vf_vignette: use AVFilterContext for logging

[Tristan Matthews via ffmpeg-devel <ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org>]

Hi,

On Tuesday, August 12th, 2025 at 5:51 AM, Niklas Haas <ffmpeg@haasn.xyz> wrote:

> On Tue, 12 Aug 2025 15:08:10 +0530 Gyan Doshi ffmpeg@gyani.pro wrote:
> 
> > On 2025-08-12 03:04 pm, Niklas Haas wrote:
> > 
> > > On Tue, 12 Aug 2025 11:16:19 +0200 Nicolas George george@nsup.org wrote:
> > > 
> > > > ffmpeg-git@ffmpeg.org (HE12025-08-12):
> > > > 
> > > > > Author: Niklas Haas git@haasn.dev
> > > > > AuthorDate: Mon Aug 11 15:57:24 2025 +0200
> > > > > Commit: Niklas Haas ffmpeg@haasn.dev
> > > > > CommitDate: Tue Aug 12 09:01:39 2025 +0000
> > > > > Pushing after less than 24 hours without approval by the maintainer is
> > > > > absolutely unacceptable, forge or no forge, and a spit in my face for
> > > > > the time I invested into starting to look at the code, thankfully
> > > > > limited.
> > > > > In https://ffmpeg.org/developer.html#Patch-review-process it says:
> > > 
> > > > After a patch is approved it will be committed to the repository.
> > > > I don't see anything about a time-frame requirement here.
> > 
> > It's the last point in
> > https://ffmpeg.org/developer.html#Patches_002fCommitting
> 
> 
> I see that, but note:
> 1) the PR was approved
> 2) nobody is listed as a maintainer for these filters
> 
> Regardless, I still think we should then just establish a clear pipeline
> here to prevent this sort of discussion from happening in the future.
> 
> Timo, can something like the VLC merge bot be implemented in ForgeJo?
> 

For reference, that's https://code.videolan.org/Garf/homer-bot
Obviously that's gitlab specific but may help inform some choices here.

Best,
Tristan
_______________________________________________
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel

To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email
ffmpeg-devel-request@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".