From: "softworkz . via ffmpeg-devel" <ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org>
To: Jean-Baptiste Kempf <jb@videolan.org>,
ffmpeg-devel <ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org>
Cc: "ga@ffmpeg.org" <ga@ffmpeg.org>,
Michael Niedermayer <michael@niedermayer.cc>,
"softworkz ." <softworkz@hotmail.com>
Subject: [FFmpeg-devel] Re: [POLL][VOTE] Revoke social media delegation
Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2025 14:28:30 +0000
Message-ID: <PH8P223MB0697760E9ADB534E99638150BAFDA@PH8P223MB0697.NAMP223.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <a5ca1cb7-592c-4ca5-b34e-2fa506426cd8@app.fastmail.com>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jean-Baptiste Kempf <jb@videolan.org>
> Sent: Monday, October 27, 2025 11:52 PM
> To: ffmpeg-devel <ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org>
> Cc: ga@ffmpeg.org; Michael Niedermayer <michael@niedermayer.cc>
> Subject: Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [POLL][VOTE] Revoke social media delegation
>
> Hello Everyone,
>
> Folks, you really should all calm down.
> All this drama does not help the project, nor does it give a good image
> on the outside.
> It's not even an interesting drama (like vim vs emacs, or gcc vs llvm,
> or AV2 vs VVC...)
>
> Social Media is a lot of stress for everyone, and to be honest, we
> (nerds) are not the best at it.
> Also Social Media algorithms are done for inflaming everything
> "engagement"
>
> The FFmpeg Twitter account is very popular, because it plays with the
> edge, which means sometimes, it might be a bit off.
> But come on, this is Social Media. It is done for fighting and
> "engagement".
>
> So, just calm down, and tell people to move to the next topic.
> And listen to Steven, he is correct as usual on those matters.
>
> JB
Hi everyone,
Without having followed this in detail, I think this kind of vote doesn't
do any good for the project. Like I suggested a few times, I think we
should establish a number of "positions" for which people can apply to
volunteer and then get elected for a certain period of time, just like the
TC and CC are being elected. A "Social Media Representative" would be one
such position.
Instead of having someone who never got elected and eventually starting a
revocation poll, an elected position provides a sane procedure and also
confidence for the volunteer to be backed by a majority. When getting into
a controversial situation, the community should - at least publicly - rally
behind that elected person, even when there's disagreement regarding
certain actions, as then it will also be a responsibility of all those who
voted for that person.
When there's dissatisfaction, the community can vote for someone else for
the subsequent period.
This would be a win for all parties involved.
sw
_______________________________________________
ffmpeg-devel mailing list -- ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
To unsubscribe send an email to ffmpeg-devel-leave@ffmpeg.org
prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-10-28 14:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-10-26 15:26 [FFmpeg-devel] " Michael Niedermayer via ffmpeg-devel
2025-10-26 15:51 ` [FFmpeg-devel] " Rémi Denis-Courmont via ffmpeg-devel
2025-10-26 17:13 ` Michael Niedermayer via ffmpeg-devel
2025-10-26 17:34 ` Kieran Kunhya via ffmpeg-devel
2025-10-26 17:45 ` Rémi Denis-Courmont via ffmpeg-devel
2025-10-26 16:50 ` Lynne via ffmpeg-devel
2025-10-27 2:22 ` Steven Liu via ffmpeg-devel
2025-10-27 11:22 ` Michael Niedermayer via ffmpeg-devel
2025-10-26 16:54 ` Tomas Härdin via ffmpeg-devel
2025-10-26 17:51 ` Rémi Denis-Courmont via ffmpeg-devel
2025-10-26 18:18 ` Michael Niedermayer via ffmpeg-devel
2025-10-26 22:34 ` James Almer via ffmpeg-devel
2025-10-27 10:03 ` Rémi Denis-Courmont via ffmpeg-devel
2025-10-27 11:12 ` Rémi Denis-Courmont via ffmpeg-devel
2025-10-26 22:38 ` James Almer via ffmpeg-devel
2025-10-27 1:39 ` Michael Niedermayer via ffmpeg-devel
2025-10-27 21:39 ` James Almer via ffmpeg-devel
2025-10-27 11:26 ` Vittorio Giovara via ffmpeg-devel
2025-10-27 19:53 ` Nicolas George via ffmpeg-devel
2025-10-27 20:59 ` jamessmithswe64--- via ffmpeg-devel
2025-10-27 22:52 ` Jean-Baptiste Kempf via ffmpeg-devel
2025-10-28 14:28 ` softworkz . via ffmpeg-devel [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=PH8P223MB0697760E9ADB534E99638150BAFDA@PH8P223MB0697.NAMP223.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM \
--to=ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org \
--cc=ga@ffmpeg.org \
--cc=jb@videolan.org \
--cc=michael@niedermayer.cc \
--cc=softworkz@hotmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Git Inbox Mirror of the ffmpeg-devel mailing list - see https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
This inbox may be cloned and mirrored by anyone:
git clone --mirror https://master.gitmailbox.com/ffmpegdev/0 ffmpegdev/git/0.git
# If you have public-inbox 1.1+ installed, you may
# initialize and index your mirror using the following commands:
public-inbox-init -V2 ffmpegdev ffmpegdev/ https://master.gitmailbox.com/ffmpegdev \
ffmpegdev@gitmailbox.com
public-inbox-index ffmpegdev
Example config snippet for mirrors.
AGPL code for this site: git clone https://public-inbox.org/public-inbox.git