[FFmpeg-devel] Re: [POLL] [VOTE] code.ffmpeg.org vs. ML

["softworkz . via ffmpeg-devel" <ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org>]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Michael Niedermayer <michael@niedermayer.cc>
> Sent: Tuesday, September 16, 2025 10:49 AM
> To: FFmpeg development discussions and patches <ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org>
> Cc: ga@ffmpeg.org
> Subject: [POLL] [VOTE] code.ffmpeg.org vs. ML
> 
> Hi all
> 
> 2 months ago we voted on testing Forgejo vs Gitlab, we picked and tested
> Forgejo. And as said in that vote, (and surprisingly, i have not
> forgotten it)
> heres the "after testing" discussion and vote
> 
> do we want to keep Forgejo or switch back to the ML workflow
> (or something else)
> 
> F. keep Forgejo as primary forge for patch/git workflow
> M. switch back to the ML for patch/git workflow

Haven't had time to work with it yet. But today I made the very first comment
on a PR. Made a screenshot and pasted it into the comment field - all within
just 2 seconds. For that little detail alone:

F


softworkz

_______________________________________________
ffmpeg-devel mailing list -- ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
To unsubscribe send an email to ffmpeg-devel-leave@ffmpeg.org