From: Lynne <dev@lynne.ee>
To: FFmpeg development discussions and patches <ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org>
Subject: Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] avutil/frame: use bitfields for some boolean and enum fields
Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2023 17:06:19 +0200 (CEST)
Message-ID: <NTP2KlP--R-9@lynne.ee> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <0ff1089c-a964-21a8-a8f9-0f7c39ba63f9@gmail.com>
Apr 17, 2023, 19:27 by jamrial@gmail.com:
> On 4/17/2023 2:25 PM, Lynne wrote:
>
>> Apr 17, 2023, 17:15 by jamrial@gmail.com:
>>
>>> On 4/17/2023 12:00 PM, Lynne wrote:
>>>
>>>> Apr 17, 2023, 16:40 by jamrial@gmail.com:
>>>>
>>>>> Should reduce the size of AVFrame in the next major bump without changing the API.
>>>>>
>>>>> Suggested-by: Anton Khirnov <anton@khirnov.net>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: James Almer <jamrial@gmail.com>
>>>>> ---
>>>>> This supersedes "avutil/frame: add new interlaced and top_field_first flags"
>>>>> and "avutil/frame: add a keyframe flag to AVFrame".
>>>>>
>>>>> libavutil/frame.h | 56 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>>> libavutil/version.h | 1 +
>>>>> 2 files changed, 57 insertions(+)
>>>>>
>>>>> diff --git a/libavutil/frame.h b/libavutil/frame.h
>>>>> index f85d630c5c..c26067f383 100644
>>>>> --- a/libavutil/frame.h
>>>>> +++ b/libavutil/frame.h
>>>>> @@ -416,6 +416,7 @@ typedef struct AVFrame {
>>>>> */
>>>>> int format;
>>>>> +#if FF_API_BITFIELDS
>>>>> /**
>>>>> * 1 -> keyframe, 0-> not
>>>>> */
>>>>> @@ -425,6 +426,57 @@ typedef struct AVFrame {
>>>>> * Picture type of the frame.
>>>>> */
>>>>> enum AVPictureType pict_type;
>>>>> +#else
>>>>> + /**
>>>>> + * 1 -> keyframe, 0-> not
>>>>> + */
>>>>> + unsigned int key_frame: 1;
>>>>> +
>>>>> + /**
>>>>> + * The content of the picture is interlaced.
>>>>> + */
>>>>> + unsigned int interlaced_frame: 1;
>>>>> +
>>>>> + /**
>>>>> + * If the content is interlaced, is top field displayed first.
>>>>> + */
>>>>> + unsigned int top_field_first: 1;
>>>>> +
>>>>> + /**
>>>>> + * Tell user application that palette has changed from previous frame.
>>>>> + */
>>>>> + unsigned int palette_has_changed: 1;
>>>>> +
>>>>> + /**
>>>>> + * Reserved. Must not be touched.
>>>>> + */
>>>>> + unsigned int reserved_bitfield: (sizeof(unsigned int) * 8) - 9;
>>>>> +
>>>>> + /**
>>>>> + * MPEG vs JPEG YUV range.
>>>>> + * - encoding: Set by user
>>>>> + * - decoding: Set by libavcodec
>>>>> + */
>>>>> + enum AVColorRange color_range: 2;
>>>>> +
>>>>> + enum AVChromaLocation chroma_location: 3;
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Definitely disagree on all non-8bit field limits.
>>>> The reserved_bitfield is especially ugly.
>>>> A few wasted bits wouldn't affect much, we don't even support building on 6502s.
>>>> Use bools, or limit them to 8bits so we can use bools when we bump?
>>>> The rest can be limited to 8bits.
>>>>
>>>
>>> I added reserved_bitfield to turn what otherwise will be compiler-injected padding into something that can be reused if we were to add new fields here instead of at the end of the struct. I can remove it if you prefer, and make color_range and chroma_location into :8.
>>> Like i told you on IRC, i want to keep these as enum and not change their type to uint8_t, _Bool, or anything like that. Also, i wouldn't be surprised if using _Bool breaks some old weird compilers.
>>>
>>> With this change, I'm replacing 40 bytes worth of fields with 8 bytes worth of fields with no API break.
>>>
>>
>> I'm fine with enums staying as enums, and limiting them to 8 bits.
>> I'm not fine with limiting flags to 1 bit or 2/3 bits. I'd like for them to
>> be limited to 8 bits, and changing their type to bool or uint8_t at the
>> bump. You're still saving at least 21 bytes.
>>
>
> But why use 8 bits when we can use 1?
>
No need for explicit padding. They're able to be set via pointers, simplifying FFI.
They're faster to access. We could need to extend color_range and chroma_location
in the future. It's not worth saving a few tens of bits in a large struct that's going
to have to grow larger if we want to support e.g. subtitles in avframes.
_______________________________________________
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email
ffmpeg-devel-request@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-04-19 15:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-04-17 14:39 James Almer
2023-04-17 15:00 ` Lynne
2023-04-17 15:15 ` James Almer
2023-04-17 17:25 ` Lynne
2023-04-17 17:27 ` James Almer
2023-04-19 15:06 ` Lynne [this message]
2023-04-17 17:19 ` Anton Khirnov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=NTP2KlP--R-9@lynne.ee \
--to=dev@lynne.ee \
--cc=ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Git Inbox Mirror of the ffmpeg-devel mailing list - see https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
This inbox may be cloned and mirrored by anyone:
git clone --mirror https://master.gitmailbox.com/ffmpegdev/0 ffmpegdev/git/0.git
# If you have public-inbox 1.1+ installed, you may
# initialize and index your mirror using the following commands:
public-inbox-init -V2 ffmpegdev ffmpegdev/ https://master.gitmailbox.com/ffmpegdev \
ffmpegdev@gitmailbox.com
public-inbox-index ffmpegdev
Example config snippet for mirrors.
AGPL code for this site: git clone https://public-inbox.org/public-inbox.git