Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] lavc: deprecate avcodec_dct, av_fft, av_dct, av_rdft and av_mdct

[Lynne <dev@lynne.ee>]

Feb 17, 2023, 18:08 by jamrial@gmail.com:

> On 2/17/2023 1:54 PM, Lynne wrote:
>
>> This reverts commit 26cb36f35746fe6ef53688b119852bfa6d555f62.
>>
>> All filters and all codecs (except wmavoice) have been ported for the
>> lavu/tx API.
>>
>> The noise should be minimal.
>>
>
> It isn't. I'm getting more than two thousand lines of warnings after applying this patch from
>
> libavfilter/vf_spp.c
> libavfilter/x86/vf_spp.c
> libavcodec/asvenc.c
> libavcodec/avdct.c
> libavcodec/avfft.c
> libavcodec/dct.c
> libavcodec/fdctdsp.c
> libavcodec/fft_float.c
> libavcodec/fft_init_table.c
> libavcodec/idctdsp.c
> libavcodec/jfdctfst.c
> libavcodec/jfdctint.c
> libavcodec/jrevdct.c
> libavcodec/mpegaudiodsp.c
> libavcodec/mpegvideo_enc.c
> libavcodec/rdft.c
> libavcodec/wmavoice.c
> libavcodec/x86/dct_init.c
> libavcodec/x86/fft_init.c
> libavcodec/x86/mpegvideoenc.c
>
> It's not just wmavoice, there's also mpeg and jpeg stuff, and one filter. For the actual fft/dct/rdft/mdct source files, you should use the deprecation warning pragmas to silence them, but the other modules need to be ported.
> This patch is also missing the schedule FF_API deprecation wrapper.
>

Is the noise acceptable if I just deprecate the functions?
It wasn't before, but it should be much less now.
_______________________________________________
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel

To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email
ffmpeg-devel-request@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".