From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from ffbox0-bg.mplayerhq.hu (ffbox0-bg.ffmpeg.org [79.124.17.100]) by master.gitmailbox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EDF994100E for ; Sun, 2 Jan 2022 18:13:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [127.0.1.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ffbox0-bg.mplayerhq.hu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 519FC68B132; Sun, 2 Jan 2022 20:13:02 +0200 (EET) Received: from w4.tutanota.de (w4.tutanota.de [81.3.6.165]) by ffbox0-bg.mplayerhq.hu (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6CFE2689991 for ; Sun, 2 Jan 2022 20:12:55 +0200 (EET) Received: from w3.tutanota.de (unknown [192.168.1.164]) by w4.tutanota.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1BFF210601FE for ; Sun, 2 Jan 2022 18:12:55 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1641147174; s=s1; d=lynne.ee; h=From:From:To:To:Subject:Subject:Content-Description:Content-ID:Content-Type:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Cc:Date:Date:In-Reply-To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:MIME-Version:Message-ID:Message-ID:Reply-To:References:References:Sender; bh=IoxwsqUrACJ/1oMgic0/FIlSJSsW+7VthHQToXR8Vx0=; b=pOB16k3UYWLjePRxj8sz/cdApZzMtrVFG0YnG+6E9XLPyJkaa3FxQxtZNqrSJhj0 Wn4+ZideySeb1zEu2Z5M5TWbnwUNAo+lmU1EZ1E0VB8HRBBaFOW1VsMT3fPIZc/IOec 030QAukgCOSsb178Y5borAjgbClWFVEccW7S1cudMayAb7dW5ROXdJrq+jtVuldejan Z58yDWRObbbfRDmDh06zEykaBptUaBZSQIm3nLZIA1IkpAguUF/lswaUYBJQBLQVXIe X1ifJsNjVGBHgMuyFHmBzjvIXadJcVFauhX7q295Ij3mdp3eTi/vWYU5DBi1+AjPjHu 5Sje1HjkeQ== Date: Sun, 2 Jan 2022 19:12:54 +0100 (CET) From: Lynne To: FFmpeg development discussions and patches Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <20220102171149.GL2829255@pb2> References: <20211231165245.GI2829255@pb2> <20211231194024.GJ2829255@pb2> <164113275711.2375.2561092812450139105@lain.red.khirnov.net> <35404072.zGk2CCufKt@morningstar> <6700575c-8e6e-80e4-aedc-ca82c297e432@gmail.com> <6328ab8a-0eb8-d53d-9abc-dbc77ee89998@zanevaniperen.com> <20220102171149.GL2829255@pb2> MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [FFmpeg-devel] 5.0 release X-BeenThere: ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: FFmpeg development discussions and patches List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: FFmpeg development discussions and patches Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: ffmpeg-devel-bounces@ffmpeg.org Sender: "ffmpeg-devel" Archived-At: List-Archive: List-Post: 2 Jan 2022, 18:11 by michael@niedermayer.cc: > On Sun, Jan 02, 2022 at 05:28:24PM +0100, Lynne wrote: > >> 2 Jan 2022, 16:52 by zane@zanevaniperen.com: >> >> > >> > >> > On 3/1/22 01:09, James Almer wrote: >> > >> >>>> Reverting something in the release branch is already going to be dirty >> >>>> no matter what, because we do a minor bump to ensure the release has its >> >>>> own soname. Right now that'd mean 5.0 will be lavf 59.13, while lacking >> >>>> a demuxer available in lavf 59.12 >> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> Depends on what you mean by "lacking a demuxer"... One (hacky) option would >> >>> be to replace it with a stub implementation that always fails. >> >>> >> >> >> >> Or tag it as experimental. >> >> >> > >> > That's much better. If we're not willing to wait, then I suggest we do this. >> > >> >> I'd rather have it reverted in master, branch 5.0, and add it back and bump minor >> again. I'm not willing to wait for a month to get fuzzing, the release is way >> overdue as-is. We generally don't put experimental on decoders or demuxers. >> > > I think if we dont want it in the release either as you suggest > revert in master or mark as experimental in master before the branch > > having special cases in the release branch feels a bit iffy > Okay, I can live with an experimental flag on it for the time being. _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-devel-request@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".