From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from ffbox0-bg.mplayerhq.hu (ffbox0-bg.ffmpeg.org [79.124.17.100]) by master.gitmailbox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 33DD540FE5 for ; Sun, 2 Jan 2022 16:28:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [127.0.1.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ffbox0-bg.mplayerhq.hu (Postfix) with ESMTP id E455E68B153; Sun, 2 Jan 2022 18:28:33 +0200 (EET) Received: from w4.tutanota.de (w4.tutanota.de [81.3.6.165]) by ffbox0-bg.mplayerhq.hu (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0342E68B132 for ; Sun, 2 Jan 2022 18:28:28 +0200 (EET) Received: from w3.tutanota.de (unknown [192.168.1.164]) by w4.tutanota.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8AC57106016D for ; Sun, 2 Jan 2022 16:28:27 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1641140904; s=s1; d=lynne.ee; h=From:From:To:To:Subject:Subject:Content-Description:Content-ID:Content-Type:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Cc:Date:Date:In-Reply-To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:MIME-Version:Message-ID:Message-ID:Reply-To:References:References:Sender; bh=0tzTUkPe32lA6vdtOiLIBnhs5eVItkn3+pcQ/gt6XO4=; b=vcGJBeW7NKGqd3e/g+GVLaMguNzCiik8d6h2KSxYf83ZU2FVmldCDub1vAhhqPDq W5RjpjNz0nKT0NUmU9Y8fobf1INn24n1Ue9dbt6+Lv75yi9ykqF/JC5LyCAtLqx4vk7 Xs1c7SVTA6Fa7nGUQ4Z6fHVSivg8wR4kdUgcwVSqvI5RTM15BMsOPFqhL6bMVRIvkWi wRJBJyDVGfmPa+Gb2omyupe01TqXh6hsnlY9EaY+mPjs5BbZ0aAb+Fr6ITCUmUnKBOH yCGPIBU79kyGM8NsqTF3EFVQ5hC/cRf+VkzKCfmY3lSLBojcxv0sYPc6cnW0aAp5kNw kawpAwYxtQ== Date: Sun, 2 Jan 2022 17:28:24 +0100 (CET) From: Lynne To: FFmpeg development discussions and patches Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <6328ab8a-0eb8-d53d-9abc-dbc77ee89998@zanevaniperen.com> References: <51c690dc-3c74-4a24-b83c-5fb81b0f8daf@beta.fastmail.com> <20211227235514.GY2829255@pb2> <20211231165245.GI2829255@pb2> <20211231194024.GJ2829255@pb2> <164113275711.2375.2561092812450139105@lain.red.khirnov.net> <35404072.zGk2CCufKt@morningstar> <6700575c-8e6e-80e4-aedc-ca82c297e432@gmail.com> <6328ab8a-0eb8-d53d-9abc-dbc77ee89998@zanevaniperen.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [FFmpeg-devel] 5.0 release X-BeenThere: ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: FFmpeg development discussions and patches List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: FFmpeg development discussions and patches Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: ffmpeg-devel-bounces@ffmpeg.org Sender: "ffmpeg-devel" Archived-At: List-Archive: List-Post: 2 Jan 2022, 16:52 by zane@zanevaniperen.com: > > > On 3/1/22 01:09, James Almer wrote: > >>>> Reverting something in the release branch is already going to be dirty >>>> no matter what, because we do a minor bump to ensure the release has its >>>> own soname. Right now that'd mean 5.0 will be lavf 59.13, while lacking >>>> a demuxer available in lavf 59.12 >>>> >>> >>> Depends on what you mean by "lacking a demuxer"... One (hacky) option would >>> be to replace it with a stub implementation that always fails. >>> >> >> Or tag it as experimental. >> > > That's much better. If we're not willing to wait, then I suggest we do this. > I'd rather have it reverted in master, branch 5.0, and add it back and bump minor again. I'm not willing to wait for a month to get fuzzing, the release is way overdue as-is. We generally don't put experimental on decoders or demuxers. >> Also, unless ossfuzz compiles with libxml2 enabled, we're not going to see any kind of fuzzing for imf from it. >> > > I just checked - it doesn't. I'm adding it and will send a PR. > _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-devel-request@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".