Git Inbox Mirror of the ffmpeg-devel mailing list - see https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Nicolas Gaullier <nicolas.gaullier@cji.paris>
To: FFmpeg development discussions and patches <ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org>
Subject: Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH 3/6] avformat/s337m: New ff_s337m_probe()
Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2023 10:57:12 +0000
Message-ID: <MR1P264MB2483254B8091E2E0FC54A6C59BA59@MR1P264MB2483.FRAP264.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ab454c4ccfa7f6816ddbbd9e61c03418803e84c7.camel@haerdin.se>

>> ff_s337m_probe is very similar to s337m_probe: what mainly differs is 
>> the input parameters.
>> The one little thing I added is the S337M_PROBE_GUARDBAND_MIN_BYTES.
>> Currently it is set to 0, so has no effect (and of course I can remove 
>> it if someone object).
>> There is two things to know about it:
>> - one is that some DolbyE decoder implementations does not support the 
>> s337m sync word to be the first word, A minimal guard band (full of 
>> zero) is required in such a case : 1 word is enough in the cases I 
>> experimented.
>> One developer might find it useful to set 
>> S337M_PROBE_GUARDBAND_MIN_BYTES to 1 in order to ffprobe-qc/reject 
>> such files.
>> - one other thing is that, currently, the detection is based on 3 
>> consecutive samples, But there are other implementations in the wild. 
>> A common single- sample implementation is to simply require a 
>> sufficient S337M_PROBE_GUARDBAND_MIN_BYTES in order to avoid a fake 
>> detection.
>> (for 16 bits, this is really dangerous!; for 24 bits, I think it is 
>> fair but would still require some little additions to be 100% sure).
>
>What a mess.. And there's no other way to reliably probe this?
>
>/Tomas

No! But the statistics are such that at some time, a fake probe is not "possible".
Anyway, we already have stream probings in current code, not only considering wav.
I think my patch is similar to the spdif probe and safe.

Nicolas
_______________________________________________
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel

To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email
ffmpeg-devel-request@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".

  reply	other threads:[~2023-02-21 10:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-02-13 18:09 [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH 0/6] wavdev: s337m support Nicolas Gaullier
2023-02-13 18:09 ` [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH 1/6] avformat/s337m: Split read_packet/get_packet Nicolas Gaullier
2023-02-16 10:36   ` Tomas Härdin
2023-02-13 18:09 ` [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH 2/6] avformat/s337m: Consider container bit resolution Nicolas Gaullier
2023-02-16 10:36   ` Tomas Härdin
2023-02-17  9:44     ` Nicolas Gaullier
2023-02-21  9:47       ` Tomas Härdin
2023-02-21 10:43         ` Nicolas Gaullier
2023-02-22 10:07           ` Tomas Härdin
2023-02-13 18:09 ` [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH 3/6] avformat/s337m: New ff_s337m_probe() Nicolas Gaullier
2023-02-16 10:36   ` Tomas Härdin
2023-02-17 10:12     ` Nicolas Gaullier
2023-02-21  9:41       ` Tomas Härdin
2023-02-21 10:57         ` Nicolas Gaullier [this message]
2023-02-13 18:09 ` [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH 4/6] avformat/wavdec: s337m support Nicolas Gaullier
2023-02-16 10:36   ` Tomas Härdin
2023-02-17 10:30     ` Nicolas Gaullier
2023-02-21  9:53       ` Tomas Härdin
2023-02-21 12:30         ` Nicolas Gaullier
2023-02-22 10:10           ` Tomas Härdin
2023-02-13 18:09 ` [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH 5/6] avformat/wavdec.c: Reindent after last commit Nicolas Gaullier
2023-02-13 18:09 ` [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH 6/6] avformat/wavdec: Test s337m Nicolas Gaullier

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=MR1P264MB2483254B8091E2E0FC54A6C59BA59@MR1P264MB2483.FRAP264.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM \
    --to=nicolas.gaullier@cji.paris \
    --cc=ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

Git Inbox Mirror of the ffmpeg-devel mailing list - see https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel

This inbox may be cloned and mirrored by anyone:

	git clone --mirror https://master.gitmailbox.com/ffmpegdev/0 ffmpegdev/git/0.git

	# If you have public-inbox 1.1+ installed, you may
	# initialize and index your mirror using the following commands:
	public-inbox-init -V2 ffmpegdev ffmpegdev/ https://master.gitmailbox.com/ffmpegdev \
		ffmpegdev@gitmailbox.com
	public-inbox-index ffmpegdev

Example config snippet for mirrors.


AGPL code for this site: git clone https://public-inbox.org/public-inbox.git