From: Andreas Rheinhardt <andreas.rheinhardt@outlook.com> To: ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org Subject: Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH 2/2] swscale/input: Avoid calls to av_pix_fmt_desc_get() Date: Thu, 8 Sep 2022 23:44:51 +0200 Message-ID: <GV1P250MB073756CC11B4A80A29AB7BA48F409@GV1P250MB0737.EURP250.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM> (raw) In-Reply-To: <20220908202528.GB2088045@pb2> Michael Niedermayer: > On Thu, Sep 08, 2022 at 09:38:51PM +0200, Andreas Rheinhardt wrote: >> Michael Niedermayer: >>> Hi >>> >>> On Thu, Sep 08, 2022 at 04:38:11AM +0200, Andreas Rheinhardt wrote: >>>> Up until now, libswscale/input.c used a macro to read >>>> an input pixel which involved a call to av_pix_fmt_desc_get() >>>> to find out whether the input pixel format is BE or LE >>>> despite this being known at compile-time (there are templates >>>> per pixfmt). Even worse, these calls are made in a loop, >>>> so that e.g. there are six calls to av_pix_fmt_desc_get() >>>> for every pair of UV pixel processed in >>>> rgb64ToUV_half_c_template(). >>>> >>>> This commit modifies these macros to ensure that isBE() >>>> is evaluated at compile-time. This saved 9743B of .text >>>> for me (GCC 11.2, -O3). >>> >>> hmm, all these functions where supposed to be optimized out >>> why where they not ? >>> >>> iam asking as the code is simpler before your patch if that >>> "optimization out" thing would work >>> >> >> Why should these functions be optimized out? What would enable the >> compiler to optimize them out? > > Going back into the past, there was > 6b0768e2021b90215a2ab55ed427bce91d148148 > > before this the code certainly did get optimized out, it was just > #define isBE(x) ((x)&1) > > thats simple and clean code btw I don't really consider such magic numbers to be clean. > after this it became > > #define isBE(x) \ > + (av_pix_fmt_descriptors[x].flags & PIX_FMT_BE) > > thats still really good, and very readable, its a const array so > one would assume that a compiler can figure that out at compile time > well, i try not to think of linking and seperate objects here ;) > > next it got then replaced by a function and a call that i suspect > people thought would be inlined > > >> (And I really don't see why this patch would make the code more >> complicated.) > > the code historically was capable to lookup any flag and detail > of a pixel format at compile time > now your code works around that not working. Introducing a 2nd > system to do this in parallel. I am not introducing a second system, I am reusing the existing system, namely our existing naming system (the fact that we use BE/LE in the name of BE/LE pixel formats). > To me if i look at the evolution > of isBE() / code checking BE-ness it become more messy over time > > I think it would be interresting to think about if we can make > av_pix_fmt_desc_get(compile time constant) work at compile time. > or if we maybe can return to a simpler implementation > We could put the av_pix_fmt_descriptors array into an internal header and use something like static av_always_inline const AVPixFmtDescriptor *ff_pix_fmt_descriptor_get(enum AVPixelFormat fmt) { if (av_builtin_constant_p(fmt)) return &av_pix_fmt_descriptors[fmt]; return av_pix_fmt_desc_get(fmt); } - Andreas _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-devel-request@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-09-08 21:45 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2022-09-08 2:31 [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH 1/2] swscale/input: Remove spec-incompliant '; ' Andreas Rheinhardt 2022-09-08 2:38 ` [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH 2/2] swscale/input: Avoid calls to av_pix_fmt_desc_get() Andreas Rheinhardt 2022-09-08 17:39 ` Michael Niedermayer 2022-09-08 19:38 ` Andreas Rheinhardt 2022-09-08 20:25 ` Michael Niedermayer 2022-09-08 21:44 ` Andreas Rheinhardt [this message] 2022-09-09 14:55 ` Michael Niedermayer 2022-09-09 18:15 ` Andreas Rheinhardt 2022-09-10 15:29 ` Michael Niedermayer 2022-09-10 16:34 ` Andreas Rheinhardt 2022-09-10 17:06 ` Michael Niedermayer 2022-09-09 15:52 ` Michael Niedermayer 2022-09-08 3:31 ` [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH 3/3] swscale/output: Don't call av_pix_fmt_desc_get() in a loop Andreas Rheinhardt 2022-09-16 8:39 ` Paul B Mahol 2022-09-08 3:44 ` [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH 1/2] swscale/input: Remove spec-incompliant '; ' Philip Langdale 2022-09-16 7:00 [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH 2/2] swscale/input: Avoid calls to av_pix_fmt_desc_get() Anton Khirnov 2022-09-16 10:57 ` Michael Niedermayer 2022-09-18 20:58 ` Andreas Rheinhardt
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=GV1P250MB073756CC11B4A80A29AB7BA48F409@GV1P250MB0737.EURP250.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM \ --to=andreas.rheinhardt@outlook.com \ --cc=ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Git Inbox Mirror of the ffmpeg-devel mailing list - see https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel This inbox may be cloned and mirrored by anyone: git clone --mirror https://master.gitmailbox.com/ffmpegdev/0 ffmpegdev/git/0.git # If you have public-inbox 1.1+ installed, you may # initialize and index your mirror using the following commands: public-inbox-init -V2 ffmpegdev ffmpegdev/ https://master.gitmailbox.com/ffmpegdev \ ffmpegdev@gitmailbox.com public-inbox-index ffmpegdev Example config snippet for mirrors. AGPL code for this site: git clone https://public-inbox.org/public-inbox.git