Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [RFC] Subtitle Filtering Ramp-Up

From: "softworkz ." <softworkz-at-hotmail.com@ffmpeg.org>
To: FFmpeg development discussions and patches <ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org>
Subject: Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [RFC] Subtitle Filtering Ramp-Up
Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2025 17:17:07 +0000
Message-ID: <DM8P223MB0365F942D6ED56BD03477C07BA6DA@DM8P223MB0365.NAMP223.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <d0b5ae64-2947-498c-aaba-0f1813ed80c2@lynne.ee>

> -----Original Message-----
> From: ffmpeg-devel <ffmpeg-devel-bounces@ffmpeg.org> On Behalf Of Lynne
> Sent: Dienstag, 3. Juni 2025 18:00
> To: ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
> Subject: Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [RFC] Subtitle Filtering Ramp-Up
> 
> You don't get to say "oh, there were no more objections, so it was fine"
> or "the use is evident" after the mess that your original patchsets were.
> 
> You're still not using the native time fields, nor the packet buffers,
> which is a very hard NAK from me.
> 

After the recent events it is understandable when actions are 
driven by personal sentiments rather than professional judgement.

I'm afraid to see this, but nothing has been reported that wasn't true,

Reference:

https://lists.ffmpeg.org/pipermail/ffmpeg-devel/2025-May/344411.html

Regards
sw
_______________________________________________
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel

To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email
ffmpeg-devel-request@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".