Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH WIP 01/10] ffbuild/bin2c: Use zlib directly instead of gzip

From: "softworkz ." <softworkz-at-hotmail.com@ffmpeg.org>
To: FFmpeg development discussions and patches <ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org>
Subject: Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH WIP 01/10] ffbuild/bin2c: Use zlib directly instead of gzip
Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2025 14:35:29 +0000
Message-ID: <DM8P223MB0365E0B03E92BFA7CFCCC007BA73A@DM8P223MB0365.NAMP223.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aFF3EdUuvcoGsOuR@phare.normalesup.org>

> -----Original Message-----
> From: ffmpeg-devel <ffmpeg-devel-bounces@ffmpeg.org> On Behalf Of
> Nicolas George
> Sent: Tuesday, June 17, 2025 4:09 PM
> To: FFmpeg development discussions and patches <ffmpeg-
> devel@ffmpeg.org>
> Subject: Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH WIP 01/10] ffbuild/bin2c: Use zlib
> directly instead of gzip
> 
> softworkz . (HE12025-06-17):
> > It's not about replacing zlib in general. The scope is having our own
> > compression code for ptx and resource compression only.
> 
> This is what I understood.

But obviously you didn't:

> If you can write a zlib replacement specifically for FFmpeg with some technical
> benefit over other implementations, do so.

I didn't talk about a zlib replacement. It is about any kind of compression code,
not needing to be zlib compatible at all.

> go away.

Likewise!

sw
_______________________________________________
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel

To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email
ffmpeg-devel-request@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".