Git Inbox Mirror of the ffmpeg-devel mailing list - see https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Soft Works <softworkz@hotmail.com>
To: FFmpeg development discussions and patches <ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org>
Subject: Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH 2/4] doc/developer.texi: extend the argument for submitting patches
Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2022 09:35:40 +0000
Message-ID: <DM8P223MB0365D8B9C3D10EDB607F5C72BA059@DM8P223MB0365.NAMP223.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20221114091309.15755-2-anton@khirnov.net>



> -----Original Message-----
> From: ffmpeg-devel <ffmpeg-devel-bounces@ffmpeg.org> On Behalf Of
> Anton Khirnov
> Sent: Monday, November 14, 2022 10:13 AM
> To: ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
> Subject: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH 2/4] doc/developer.texi: extend the
> argument for submitting patches
> 
> Stop talking about commercial programs, since this applies to any
> downstream user.
> ---
>  doc/developer.texi | 20 +++++++++++++++-----
>  1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/doc/developer.texi b/doc/developer.texi
> index 5cf3b19ee0..2f0d2b7daa 100644
> --- a/doc/developer.texi
> +++ b/doc/developer.texi
> @@ -24,11 +24,21 @@ generated from the headers
>  the examples under @file{doc/examples}
>  @end itemize
> 
> -You can use the FFmpeg libraries in your commercial program, but you
> -are encouraged to @emph{publish any patch you make}. In this case
> the
> -best way to proceed is to send your patches to the ffmpeg-devel
> -mailing list following the guidelines illustrated in the remainder
> of
> -this document.
> +If you modify FFmpeg code for your own use case, you are highly
> encouraged to
> +@emph{submit your changes back to us}, using this document as a
> guide. There are
> +both pragmatic and ideological reasons to do so:
> +@itemize @bullet
> +@item
> +Maintaining external changes to keep up with upstream development is
> +time-consuming and error-prone. With your code in the main tree, it
> will be
> +maintained by FFmpeg developers.

You should mention that sometimes it's not really worth to take the effort,
because waiting for reviews and permanent rebasing and re-submitting,
explaining, defending, getting insulted or ignored and whatsoever,
might end up taking much more time than just to keep and maintain your 
changes privately. Eventually you might regret that you have even
started going that way.

Regards,
softworkz
_______________________________________________
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel

To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email
ffmpeg-devel-request@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".

  reply	other threads:[~2022-11-14  9:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-11-14  9:13 [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH 1/4] doc/developer.texi: improve the introductory text Anton Khirnov
2022-11-14  9:13 ` [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH 2/4] doc/developer.texi: extend the argument for submitting patches Anton Khirnov
2022-11-14  9:35   ` Soft Works [this message]
2022-11-14  9:53   ` Anton Khirnov
2022-11-14 10:46     ` Soft Works
2022-11-14 11:07   ` Anton Khirnov
2022-11-14 11:20     ` Soft Works
2022-11-14 11:40     ` Soft Works
2022-11-14 12:42     ` Nicolas George
2022-11-14 14:34     ` Anton Khirnov
2022-11-14 15:13       ` Soft Works
2022-11-14 15:18         ` Paul B Mahol
2022-11-14 15:39           ` Soft Works
2022-11-14 15:45           ` Soft Works
2022-11-14 16:13       ` Anton Khirnov
2022-11-14 16:38         ` Soft Works
2022-11-14 16:40           ` Nicolas George
2022-11-14 17:25             ` Soft Works
2022-11-14 17:47               ` Nicolas George
2022-11-14 22:05         ` Michael Niedermayer
2022-11-14 22:49           ` Soft Works
2022-11-14  9:13 ` [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH 3/4] doc/developer.texi: demote the "contributing" chapter to a section Anton Khirnov
2022-11-14  9:13 ` [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH 4/4] doc/developer.texi: refine the "contributing code" section Anton Khirnov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=DM8P223MB0365D8B9C3D10EDB607F5C72BA059@DM8P223MB0365.NAMP223.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM \
    --to=softworkz@hotmail.com \
    --cc=ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

Git Inbox Mirror of the ffmpeg-devel mailing list - see https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel

This inbox may be cloned and mirrored by anyone:

	git clone --mirror https://master.gitmailbox.com/ffmpegdev/0 ffmpegdev/git/0.git

	# If you have public-inbox 1.1+ installed, you may
	# initialize and index your mirror using the following commands:
	public-inbox-init -V2 ffmpegdev ffmpegdev/ https://master.gitmailbox.com/ffmpegdev \
		ffmpegdev@gitmailbox.com
	public-inbox-index ffmpegdev

Example config snippet for mirrors.


AGPL code for this site: git clone https://public-inbox.org/public-inbox.git