Re: [FFmpeg-devel] I've written a filter in Rust

[Soft Works <softworkz-at-hotmail.com@ffmpeg.org>]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: ffmpeg-devel <ffmpeg-devel-bounces@ffmpeg.org> On Behalf Of
> Kieran Kunhya via ffmpeg-devel
> Sent: Freitag, 21. Februar 2025 15:53
> To: FFmpeg development discussions and patches <ffmpeg-
> devel@ffmpeg.org>
> Cc: Kieran Kunhya <kieran618@googlemail.com>
> Subject: Re: [FFmpeg-devel] I've written a filter in Rust
> 
> On Fri, 21 Feb 2025, 14:30 Soft Works, <softworkz-at-
> hotmail.com@ffmpeg.org>
> wrote:
> 
> >
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: ffmpeg-devel <ffmpeg-devel-bounces@ffmpeg.org> On Behalf Of
> > > Michael Niedermayer
> > > Sent: Freitag, 21. Februar 2025 14:22
> > > To: FFmpeg development discussions and patches <ffmpeg-
> > > devel@ffmpeg.org>
> > > Subject: Re: [FFmpeg-devel] I've written a filter in Rust
> > >
> > > Hi
> > >
> > > On Fri, Feb 21, 2025 at 10:01:56AM +0100, Tomas Härdin wrote:
> > > > tor 2025-02-20 klockan 23:49 +0100 skrev Michael Niedermayer:
> > > > > Hi
> > > > >
> > > > > On Thu, Feb 20, 2025 at 02:06:47PM +0100, Leandro Santiago wrote:
> > > > > > [insert meme here]
> > > > > [...]
> > > > > > I also recorded a video showing the filter in action [7].
> > > > > [...
> > > > > > [7] https://youtu.be/U_y4-NnaINg
> > > > >
> > > > > cool, it doesnt detect everyone though
> > > > >
> > > > > also i think this shows how useful a plugin framework would be for
> > > > > ffmpeg
> > > > >
> > > > > with plugins everyone could use,test and contribute to this today.
> > > > > without plugins, this needs to be merged in ffmpeg git master. (which
> > > > > will take some time i suspect)
> > > >
> > > > Have we not gone over and rejected plugins many times? I recall points
> > >
> > > no
> > > there was no formal and no public informal vote that i remember.
> > >
> > > ive raised the issue with plugins many times. Because it would
> > > allow people and myself to contribute more complex features and
> > > end the stagnation of FFmpeg.
> >
> > Yup, that's exactly one of the reasons why other projects like GStreamer
> > have gained that much popularity. It might not have happened when
> > ffmpeg would have been more open and extensible in the first place.
> >
> 
> It's quite the opposite. Gstreamer is successful in its vertical because it
> allows easy inclusion of vendor binary blobs. This is not "open and
> extensible".

Open means it's extensible for everybody, including vendors. I fail to see
what's bad about it. Do we have a fight against everything commercial?

What are you afraid of to happen?

Just wanna understand the position, thanks.
sw
_______________________________________________
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel

To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email
ffmpeg-devel-request@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".