From: "softworkz ." <softworkz-at-hotmail.com@ffmpeg.org> To: FFmpeg development discussions and patches <ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org> Subject: Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [RFC] Subtitle Filtering Ramp-Up Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2025 19:02:21 +0000 Message-ID: <DM8P223MB0365312ED482E362DE1664F5BA6CA@DM8P223MB0365.NAMP223.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM> (raw) In-Reply-To: <7809837.EvYhyI6sBW@basile.remlab.net> > -----Original Message----- > From: ffmpeg-devel <ffmpeg-devel-bounces@ffmpeg.org> On Behalf Of Rémi Denis- > Courmont > Sent: Mittwoch, 4. Juni 2025 17:49 > To: FFmpeg development discussions and patches <ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org> > Subject: Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [RFC] Subtitle Filtering Ramp-Up > > Le tiistaina 3. kesäkuuta 2025, 20.07.18 Itä-Euroopan kesäaika softworkz . a > écrit : > > Given the preceding conversations, it is pretty safe to assume > > that these comments are based on personal sentiments rather than > > technical expertise. > > I won't deny the fact that several people have raised non-technical objections > against you and your work... but you have been dismissive of actual technical > objections. My first response to Hendrik was admittedly a bit overdriven, but I have followed-up with a detailed technical response shortly after. As of now, I think I have addressed all specific objections that were made. If you think that I would have missed any, please point at them. > And to start with, you set a pretty bad mood in one of your first > email this year, with your choice of words against the community. Would you be able to let me know which one you are referring to? If there was one that you still have in memory, then it must be something severe and I would like to clear it up in (the likely) case it was unintended by myself. > Also a few days ago, you literally challenged everybody on this list to > provide technical arguments against your patches, all the while preemptively > dismissing any such argument... It wasn't preemptively dismissing any arguments, but when I claim that almost nobody has actually looked at the patchset, then it's just natural that there's no point to answer for anybody where this is true. > I cannot condone ad-hominem attacks I'm not aware that I've attacked anybody else than NG, but in case I did, I am truly sorry about it. I don't want to attack anybody other than NG. Thanks sw _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-devel-request@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-06-04 19:02 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 55+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2025-06-03 14:20 softworkz . 2025-06-03 16:00 ` Lynne 2025-06-03 16:02 ` James Almer 2025-06-03 16:40 ` Nicolas George 2025-06-03 16:48 ` James Almer 2025-06-03 16:51 ` Devlist Archive 2025-06-03 17:59 ` Nicolas George 2025-06-03 16:12 ` softworkz . 2025-06-03 16:12 ` Devin Heitmueller 2025-06-03 16:43 ` Nicolas George 2025-06-03 17:07 ` softworkz . 2025-06-03 17:15 ` Devlist Archive 2025-06-03 17:16 ` Devlist Archive 2025-06-03 17:19 ` softworkz . 2025-06-04 15:49 ` Rémi Denis-Courmont 2025-06-04 17:13 ` softworkz . 2025-06-04 17:25 ` Nicolas George 2025-06-04 17:31 ` softworkz . 2025-06-04 19:02 ` softworkz . [this message] 2025-06-03 17:17 ` softworkz . 2025-06-03 16:28 ` softworkz . 2025-06-03 18:02 ` Hendrik Leppkes 2025-06-03 18:34 ` Zach Swena 2025-06-04 0:01 ` Michael Niedermayer 2025-06-04 7:13 ` Nicolas George 2025-06-04 7:22 ` Diederick C. Niehorster 2025-06-04 7:25 ` Nicolas George 2025-06-04 17:24 ` softworkz . 2025-06-04 17:29 ` Nicolas George 2025-06-04 17:33 ` softworkz . 2025-06-04 17:35 ` Nicolas George 2025-06-04 17:40 ` softworkz . 2025-06-04 17:44 ` Nicolas George 2025-06-04 17:54 ` softworkz . 2025-06-04 17:57 ` Nicolas George 2025-06-04 18:11 ` softworkz . 2025-06-04 18:12 ` Nicolas George 2025-06-04 18:17 ` softworkz . 2025-06-04 20:42 ` Michael Niedermayer 2025-06-05 0:17 ` softworkz . 2025-06-06 14:32 ` Nicolas George 2025-06-06 14:50 ` Devin Heitmueller 2025-06-08 13:10 ` Nicolas George 2025-06-06 16:54 ` softworkz . 2025-06-07 16:19 ` softworkz . 2025-06-07 17:25 ` Kieran Kunhya via ffmpeg-devel 2025-06-07 17:45 ` softworkz . 2025-06-03 19:13 ` softworkz . 2025-06-04 7:34 ` Nicolas George 2025-06-04 1:16 ` softworkz . 2025-06-04 7:36 ` Nicolas George 2025-06-03 19:23 ` softworkz . 2025-06-04 7:33 ` Nicolas George 2025-06-04 18:35 ` softworkz . 2025-06-05 0:44 ` softworkz .
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=DM8P223MB0365312ED482E362DE1664F5BA6CA@DM8P223MB0365.NAMP223.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM \ --to=softworkz-at-hotmail.com@ffmpeg.org \ --cc=ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Git Inbox Mirror of the ffmpeg-devel mailing list - see https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel This inbox may be cloned and mirrored by anyone: git clone --mirror https://master.gitmailbox.com/ffmpegdev/0 ffmpegdev/git/0.git # If you have public-inbox 1.1+ installed, you may # initialize and index your mirror using the following commands: public-inbox-init -V2 ffmpegdev ffmpegdev/ https://master.gitmailbox.com/ffmpegdev \ ffmpegdev@gitmailbox.com public-inbox-index ffmpegdev Example config snippet for mirrors. AGPL code for this site: git clone https://public-inbox.org/public-inbox.git