Git Inbox Mirror of the ffmpeg-devel mailing list - see https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Soft Works <softworkz@hotmail.com>
To: FFmpeg development discussions and patches <ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org>
Subject: Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH v11 1/6] libavutil/wchar_filename.h: Add whcartoutf8, wchartoansi and utf8toansi
Date: Tue, 10 May 2022 22:59:29 +0000
Message-ID: <DM8P223MB0365311C5EFA97AE31BD22DCBAC99@DM8P223MB0365.NAMP223.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ea-mime-627ad7ab-72eb-4f7d5170@www-7.mailo.com>



> -----Original Message-----
> From: ffmpeg-devel <ffmpeg-devel-bounces@ffmpeg.org> On Behalf Of nil-
> admirari@mailo.com
> Sent: Tuesday, May 10, 2022 11:23 PM
> To: ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
> Subject: Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH v11 1/6]
> libavutil/wchar_filename.h: Add whcartoutf8, wchartoansi and
> utf8toansi
> 
> > Paths are strings.
> 
> In other languages, paths are represented with classes, e.g.
> std::filesystem::path in C++
> or pathlib.Path in Python. In C classes have to be emulated with
> structs and functions.
> Even plain strings would've been OK to represent paths, if there was a
> set of functions
> everyone uses for path operations, but there is none. Which brings us
> to your second question.
> 
> > It needs to be found out why it was added to decide in which way it
> > can be adjusted.
> 
> Backward to forward slash adjustment is there from the very beginning:
> https://github.com/FFmpeg/FFmpeg/commit/1b30e4f5865260323da5232174fc68
> d6cc283f45.
> 
> Apparently it's needed for path concatenation, which is implemented
> with snprintf,
> whose pattern uses / as a separator even on Windows:
> https://github.com/FFmpeg/FFmpeg/blame/master/fftools/cmdutils.c#L843.

I think that can be changed easily. A path using forward slashes can
still be prefixed with '\\?\', so it will just require to go through 
the few lines of code and fix cases where this might cause an issue.


> Now back to classes. If there was a Path class, you could've changed
> the constructor
> and the path concat operation to normalise the path and prepend it
> with \\?\
> when it exceeds MAX_PATH, which is what you want me to do. Two places
> only
> (maybe some more), and the entire application becomes long-path aware.
> 
> But there is no Path class. Instead there are 587 occurrences of
> snprintf, each of which
> potentially does path concat. snprintf is not alone, strcat and the
> likes can also be used
> for path concat.
> 
> These hundreds of places have to be examined and potentially changed
> to prepend \\?\.
> And a couple dozen of places will surely be missed in the process.

I'm afraid, it's not clear to me what you are talking about here.

The prefixing can be implemented as a function and then be used 
in file_open.c.

Other file system related functions like mkdir, rename, rmdir, etc.
are already intercepted in os_support.h, and the prefixing can be 
applied there.

Maybe I missed some cases, I have not fully analyzed the situation,
but surely there are just a small number of places that need to 
be changed and not 587.


For the procedure of prefixing I would take a look at how it's done
in .NET. This is probably the most mature code for handling this
and might save us from dealing with issues and regressions until we 
got it right.


Kind regards,
softworkz
_______________________________________________
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel

To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email
ffmpeg-devel-request@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".

  reply	other threads:[~2022-05-10 22:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-04-24 12:08 nil-admirari
2022-04-24 22:04 ` Soft Works
2022-04-25  9:03   ` nil-admirari
2022-04-25  9:31     ` Soft Works
2022-04-25  9:51       ` nil-admirari
2022-04-25 11:12         ` Soft Works
2022-04-25 12:51           ` Hendrik Leppkes
2022-04-25 13:02             ` Martin Storsjö
2022-04-25 13:36               ` Soft Works
2022-04-29 19:08                 ` nil-admirari
2022-04-25 13:17             ` Soft Works
2022-04-29 18:59               ` nil-admirari
2022-04-29 18:52           ` nil-admirari
2022-04-30 12:34             ` Soft Works
2022-05-05 20:20               ` nil-admirari
2022-05-05 22:38                 ` Soft Works
2022-05-06 16:07                   ` nil-admirari
2022-05-07  2:57                     ` Soft Works
2022-05-07 17:33                       ` nil-admirari
2022-05-07 17:59                         ` Soft Works
2022-05-10 21:22                           ` nil-admirari
2022-05-10 22:59                             ` Soft Works [this message]
2022-05-10 23:32                               ` Soft Works
2022-05-11  7:46                                 ` Tobias Rapp
2022-05-11  7:57                                   ` Soft Works
2022-05-11  8:08                                     ` Hendrik Leppkes
2022-05-11  9:03                                     ` nil-admirari
2022-05-11 13:32                                     ` Tobias Rapp
2022-05-11 20:50                                       ` Soft Works
2022-05-11  8:57                               ` nil-admirari
2022-05-14  0:42                                 ` Soft Works
2022-05-15 19:53                                   ` nil-admirari
2022-05-15 20:34                                     ` Soft Works
2022-05-16  8:49                                       ` nil-admirari
2022-05-08 19:48                       ` Martin Storsjö
2022-04-25 20:51     ` Stephen Hutchinson
2022-04-29 19:25       ` nil-admirari
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2022-04-23 20:56 Nil Admirari
2022-04-24  3:39 ` Soft Works
2022-05-07 17:57 ` Soft Works

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=DM8P223MB0365311C5EFA97AE31BD22DCBAC99@DM8P223MB0365.NAMP223.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM \
    --to=softworkz@hotmail.com \
    --cc=ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

Git Inbox Mirror of the ffmpeg-devel mailing list - see https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel

This inbox may be cloned and mirrored by anyone:

	git clone --mirror https://master.gitmailbox.com/ffmpegdev/0 ffmpegdev/git/0.git

	# If you have public-inbox 1.1+ installed, you may
	# initialize and index your mirror using the following commands:
	public-inbox-init -V2 ffmpegdev ffmpegdev/ https://master.gitmailbox.com/ffmpegdev \
		ffmpegdev@gitmailbox.com
	public-inbox-index ffmpegdev

Example config snippet for mirrors.


AGPL code for this site: git clone https://public-inbox.org/public-inbox.git