From: "softworkz ." <softworkz-at-hotmail.com@ffmpeg.org>
To: FFmpeg development discussions and patches <ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org>
Subject: Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH 01/21] avutil/avassert: Add av_unreachable and av_assume() macros
Date: Wed, 7 May 2025 19:14:04 +0000
Message-ID: <DM8P223MB036509378857E4B3BC0743A1BA88A@DM8P223MB0365.NAMP223.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <DM8P223MB03655AD780884049F9491E6EBA88A@DM8P223MB0365.NAMP223.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: ffmpeg-devel <ffmpeg-devel-bounces@ffmpeg.org> On Behalf Of softworkz .
> Sent: Mittwoch, 7. Mai 2025 20:54
> To: FFmpeg development discussions and patches <ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org>
> Subject: Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH 01/21] avutil/avassert: Add av_unreachable
> and av_assume() macros
>
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: ffmpeg-devel <ffmpeg-devel-bounces@ffmpeg.org> On Behalf Of James
> Almer
> > Sent: Mittwoch, 7. Mai 2025 20:30
> > To: ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
> > Subject: Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH 01/21] avutil/avassert: Add
> av_unreachable
> > and av_assume() macros
> >
> > On 5/7/2025 2:57 PM, softworkz . wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > >> -----Original Message-----
> > >> From: ffmpeg-devel <ffmpeg-devel-bounces@ffmpeg.org> On Behalf Of Andreas
> > >> Rheinhardt
> > >> Sent: Mittwoch, 7. Mai 2025 13:59
> > >> To: FFmpeg development discussions and patches <ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org>
> > >> Subject: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH 01/21] avutil/avassert: Add av_unreachable
> > and
> > >> av_assume() macros
> > >>
> > >> Patches attached.
> > >>
> > >> - Andreas
> > >
> > > Hi Andreas,
> > >
> > > from https://ffmpeg.org/developer.html#Submitting-patches-1
> > >
> > > "..ensure the correct mime type is used (text/x-diff or text/x-patch or at
> > least text/plain) and that only one patch is inline or attached per mail."
> > >
> > > I'm saying that because the way you are submitting, Patchwork only ever
> > recognizes the first attached patch, so - in this case - the remaining 20
> > patches are not checked by the CI runs.
> > > It's also difficult to review patches that are submitted in this way, even
> > more difficult to respond, as that requires to copy the patch into a text
> > editor first, in order to add some synthetic quote marks ("> ") and when
> > replying, it isn't clear to which of the patches the reply is corresponding
> > to.
> > >
> > > As long as there's no migration to a better way, why not try out making
> PRs
> > to https://github.com/ffstaging/FFmpeg?
> >
> > I doubt "ffstaging" is affiliated with the project in any capacity.
>
> Hi James,
>
> it works like this:
>
> - You make a PR to https://github.com/ffstaging/FFmpeg
> - You make a comment with "/submit"
> - The PR will be submitted to the ML as regular patches
More specifics:
- The PR message is sent as the cover-letter text [Patch 0/n]
Markdown is converted to ASCII
- Commit messages are checked for compliance
- CI builds are run on the last commit (yet you can submit
without waiting)
- To submit new versions of a patchset, simply force-push to
your PR branch and comment "/submit" again.
The patchset will automatically be submitted as a new version
(v2, v3, etc.)
- Comments made on the ML are automatically mirrored back as PR
comments on GH
- Cover-letters sent to the ML include a range-diff, showing
the changes from the previous version
They also include Git links to directly check out the patchset
Best,
sw
_______________________________________________
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email
ffmpeg-devel-request@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-05-07 19:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-05-07 11:58 Andreas Rheinhardt
2025-05-07 17:57 ` softworkz .
2025-05-07 18:29 ` James Almer
2025-05-07 18:54 ` softworkz .
2025-05-07 19:14 ` softworkz . [this message]
2025-05-07 23:21 ` Michael Niedermayer
2025-05-07 23:38 ` softworkz .
2025-05-16 14:06 ` Andreas Rheinhardt
2025-05-16 14:52 ` Ramiro Polla
2025-05-16 18:39 ` Andreas Rheinhardt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=DM8P223MB036509378857E4B3BC0743A1BA88A@DM8P223MB0365.NAMP223.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM \
--to=softworkz-at-hotmail.com@ffmpeg.org \
--cc=ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Git Inbox Mirror of the ffmpeg-devel mailing list - see https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
This inbox may be cloned and mirrored by anyone:
git clone --mirror https://master.gitmailbox.com/ffmpegdev/0 ffmpegdev/git/0.git
# If you have public-inbox 1.1+ installed, you may
# initialize and index your mirror using the following commands:
public-inbox-init -V2 ffmpegdev ffmpegdev/ https://master.gitmailbox.com/ffmpegdev \
ffmpegdev@gitmailbox.com
public-inbox-index ffmpegdev
Example config snippet for mirrors.
AGPL code for this site: git clone https://public-inbox.org/public-inbox.git