From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from ffbox0-bg.mplayerhq.hu (ffbox0-bg.ffmpeg.org [79.124.17.100]) by master.gitmailbox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 62AA1488FE for ; Sun, 21 Apr 2024 14:44:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [127.0.1.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ffbox0-bg.mplayerhq.hu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 078BE68D0B5; Sun, 21 Apr 2024 17:44:52 +0300 (EEST) Received: from mail.cock.li (mail.cock.li [37.120.193.123]) by ffbox0-bg.mplayerhq.hu (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C02F568CC70 for ; Sun, 21 Apr 2024 17:44:45 +0300 (EEST) Mime-Version: 1.0 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=airmail.cc; s=mail; t=1713710161; bh=z5BNb4S8Khxs4nUQZtyhSBB1qlLpt8DLb1oDTyKSYNM=; h=Date:Subject:From:To:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=d3l74nUBKpsMiaMs/2ytaZyPgAmEG8XjrwxvjP4F40+IslMt+3pAA2Cdq2cC39sGE 5BWUyIsZ0rxA3Wk6LREUWE7/cKXHKJYZCzTWZyKCvvPWBCFAjdhg24rZRQu9eN2SPS qSwmGewpD29k8b/WM/6EhpJG0t+cdZx5T7cDfib3OjuBiJOeZ3fepAbnfEBXMgav5m wFyn/Dp1Sk6+nugwFcZJX9g7w/J5ZSfnOYmuQPEuBUD34BhrTCoZaUBbbUOK5Dx+Ld IwDjomLW/KQUviD3915+XtkH754xNfhULTjn1v+0LEW4hyrbVtUsdQG3viZedw13IS 8AYnLCNBg/I7w== Date: Sun, 21 Apr 2024 16:36:00 +0200 Message-Id: From: =?utf-8?q?Ond=C5=99ej_Fiala?= To: "FFmpeg development discussions and patches" X-Mailer: aerc 0.17.0 References: <20240417135832.GJ6420@pb2> <20240418201525.GR6420@pb2> <20240418224555.GT6420@pb2> In-Reply-To: <20240418224555.GT6420@pb2> Subject: Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [RFC] 5 year plan & Inovation X-BeenThere: ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: FFmpeg development discussions and patches List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: FFmpeg development discussions and patches Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: ffmpeg-devel-bounces@ffmpeg.org Sender: "ffmpeg-devel" Archived-At: List-Archive: List-Post: On Fri Apr 19, 2024 at 12:45 AM CEST, Michael Niedermayer wrote: > a small change to trac is easy to do and easy to undo, if it helps, > iam not sure a switch to GitLab/Gitea/Forgejo will happen, or even if it is a good idea. > > we lack people with time and interrest to review and apply patches > switching the tools will cost more time, and working > with these tools would also add burden (at least to me) > > other projects also seem not to have switched if i look at LKML for > example > > IMO, if we can keep the mailing list workflow and at the same time > provide people who prefer it a "in browser" way to interact with > patches, submit, approve and so on. That would be best. > It seems patchwork does not fully fill this role. > Can something be done to improve patchwork so it works better maybe ? Have you looked at SourceHut[1]? Their stated goal is building a FLOSS forge that works on top of email rather than sidetracking it like GitHub & its clones do. The whole software can AFAIK be self-hosted and includes an in-browser git viewer, issue tracker[2], and mailing lists with decent support for patches[3]. [1] https://sourcehut.org/ [2] example: https://todo.sr.ht/~sircmpwn/hare [3] example: https://lists.sr.ht/~sircmpwn/sr.ht-dev/patches _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-devel-request@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".