From: Dmitriy Kovalenko <dmtr.kovalenko@outlook.com>
To: "Martin Storsjö" <martin@martin.st>
Cc: FFmpeg development discussions and patches <ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org>
Subject: Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH 1/2] swscale: rgb_to_yuv neon optimizations
Date: Fri, 30 May 2025 07:18:46 +0000
Message-ID: <CE0BA5C0-D461-46F4-A6FC-AE6BE954A9A0@outlook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <be6b67e5-1ab0-51f3-1690-325a4f58ca8c@martin.st>
All the comments were addressed, except the prefetch one in the patch version 2 I sent earlier today. And how did you test the prefetch, because I literally run a native benchmarking on the device right now and I see that with the patch applied I am getting 5% of performance improvement. Maybe there is an issue in the way you measure the timers? I can for sure remove them because I anyway use my own implementation that is 5-10x faster than the ffmpeg's, but I am genuinely curious how is it possible that you see different benchmarking results.
> On May 30, 2025, at 09:09, Martin Storsjö <martin@martin.st> wrote:
>
> On Thu, 29 May 2025, Dmitriy Kovalenko wrote:
>
>> I appreciate the review for both the commits. I did fix all the unrelated changes and iterated in the new version, would appreciate the rearview.
>
> Don't top post.
>
> There are still at least 5 of my comments unaddressed. If you are not going to address them, then you need to respond to the comments and explain why you think the change should be kept as is.
>
> // Martin
>
_______________________________________________
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email
ffmpeg-devel-request@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-05-30 7:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-05-27 16:57 Dmitriy Kovalenko
2025-05-29 18:53 ` Martin Storsjö
2025-05-29 21:38 ` Dmitriy Kovalenko
2025-05-30 7:09 ` Martin Storsjö
2025-05-30 7:18 ` Dmitriy Kovalenko [this message]
2025-05-30 7:22 ` Martin Storsjö
2025-05-30 7:07 ` Martin Storsjö
[not found] <20250531091631.45342-1-dmtr.kovalenko@outlook.com>
2025-05-31 9:11 ` Dmitriy Kovalenko
2025-06-05 12:00 ` Martin Storsjö
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CE0BA5C0-D461-46F4-A6FC-AE6BE954A9A0@outlook.com \
--to=dmtr.kovalenko@outlook.com \
--cc=ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org \
--cc=martin@martin.st \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Git Inbox Mirror of the ffmpeg-devel mailing list - see https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
This inbox may be cloned and mirrored by anyone:
git clone --mirror https://master.gitmailbox.com/ffmpegdev/0 ffmpegdev/git/0.git
# If you have public-inbox 1.1+ installed, you may
# initialize and index your mirror using the following commands:
public-inbox-init -V2 ffmpegdev ffmpegdev/ https://master.gitmailbox.com/ffmpegdev \
ffmpegdev@gitmailbox.com
public-inbox-index ffmpegdev
Example config snippet for mirrors.
AGPL code for this site: git clone https://public-inbox.org/public-inbox.git