Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH 2/3] lavc: replace ff_thread_get_buffer() with ff_get_buffer()

[Paul B Mahol <onemda@gmail.com>]

On Fri, Mar 8, 2024 at 2:20 PM Nicolas George <george@nsup.org> wrote:

> Andreas Rheinhardt (12024-03-08):
> > What maintenance cost and complexity are you referring to? I checked and
> > could not find a single commit where one had to fix an ff_get_buffer()
> > to ff_thread_get_buffer() because it has been forgotten when the decoder
> > has been declared to support frame threading.
>
> Welcome to the new FFmpeg, where absolute consistency, i.e. catering for
> hypothetical mediocre contributors, is more important than easy
> optimizations and new approaches.
>
> And if you do not like it, “shut up, I'm on the TC and I won't recuse”.
>
> And if you do not like that, “shut up, I'm on the CC too”.
>

Is this first time I 100% agree on something with my archenemy?


>
> Regards,
>
> --
>   Nicolas George
> _______________________________________________
> ffmpeg-devel mailing list
> ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
> https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
>
> To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email
> ffmpeg-devel-request@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
>
_______________________________________________
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel

To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email
ffmpeg-devel-request@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".