From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from ffbox0-bg.mplayerhq.hu (ffbox0-bg.ffmpeg.org [79.124.17.100]) by master.gitmailbox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C93A45366 for ; Wed, 25 Jan 2023 21:20:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [127.0.1.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ffbox0-bg.mplayerhq.hu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8870768BDFB; Wed, 25 Jan 2023 23:20:11 +0200 (EET) Received: from mail-ua1-f46.google.com (mail-ua1-f46.google.com [209.85.222.46]) by ffbox0-bg.mplayerhq.hu (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 14D3C68BDE5 for ; Wed, 25 Jan 2023 23:20:05 +0200 (EET) Received: by mail-ua1-f46.google.com with SMTP id u3so5043585uae.0 for ; Wed, 25 Jan 2023 13:20:04 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=to:subject:message-id:date:from:references:in-reply-to:mime-version :from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=UTGC9aLUfZkKzm/i6oQJ74VIEjFiEpNBqyOldg2pV+0=; b=J7vQ/atfCmK8c0b7FM8k7wim1zmPfDRQx0mZhSYw24VmPpIClHcfBwpQ8pTYiUU2+Y S5nrWYwEFAUkymXvgn69z8aYqeunMXcRTz1GTPc8WWngXb96D26zUiQEE0Hz1wtwaTf9 BjY8pSXNNbuMjruu0SUYDAe/+31/gRYfUPNWsRN13GWcSus3tzmUmPRa2xxQvMBpm3F2 Sr6hhdj5vZVDj0qgpG4kt7vLm83ZKaUZwN3GL7af39fF3Qr6CfwRdIOm/3TOrBLFFe8q eUGHnuhOOBKqNWAc1+ZqKKcvTNFikgHXHE7VkYDSVgdfNmt9SIxJ7UITK0Cnucub8OwV +eLw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=to:subject:message-id:date:from:references:in-reply-to:mime-version :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=UTGC9aLUfZkKzm/i6oQJ74VIEjFiEpNBqyOldg2pV+0=; b=Nr8ve+itAYF6CdEzS8bi2sK87J2yQTXKSLsyW8pMT/JXYtKOQQOwxS4DE8m2GnVnX3 CTg+Wza1je1bappHJ6twx4vQAGfPejcK85vLz7HCOcEYYobHzXN3Kb9a2vjUcNkboLrx eL4Lm2ASNuLUCdUGvnvkNdod7HA5A4uBD5WQI7Rsb1mAMid60xhcf4iccHM6z/eABcRd qNRdmrDN+vvBEMhiU+tS1CMfr7xM74CGHVpP6h0xORAWTwBIIVrteVWSy/qggKHEB89C iRgehQWBgoCHea7XTnybRtoP1zh6aH+7Y+4z4zlWdv9N4TR5Kj2scioyuAU9RIt6qwIm XaaA== X-Gm-Message-State: AO0yUKVjlHH7MQ8IB44ZDweBJoEQDiK2FGQ7r8vbnGgE1jkDPxMwmAhx sTmKszUCCoNznSPQo1qfSLqzlruBmd+ZT/2nIn7XJ1fG X-Google-Smtp-Source: AK7set+r2TK9VWyDyzGiYo6Xt7aO1fXumQZWUW4E70KI9RTm98FLC1SwYcX4RYBM1dKxID1SS5unem+PNfRS74TNlPk= X-Received: by 2002:ab0:4905:0:b0:655:7634:8e78 with SMTP id z5-20020ab04905000000b0065576348e78mr754872uac.1.1674681602844; Wed, 25 Jan 2023 13:20:02 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 2002:a05:612c:2428:b0:32a:5eaa:92e4 with HTTP; Wed, 25 Jan 2023 13:20:01 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <4997c7ce-3db3-4062-b3b4-f65719debc43@betaapp.fastmail.com> References: <20230116133840.512-1-jamrial@gmail.com> <167457514256.4503.7425182589774123747@lain.khirnov.net> <6b01240d-95e2-db84-c40b-329a72b958c5@gmail.com> <7debdfb5-bbb3-e4c6-f95-a89a463d3abd@passwd.hu> <4997c7ce-3db3-4062-b3b4-f65719debc43@betaapp.fastmail.com> From: Paul B Mahol Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2023 22:20:01 +0100 Message-ID: To: FFmpeg development discussions and patches Subject: Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH 00/26] Major library version bump X-BeenThere: ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: FFmpeg development discussions and patches List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: FFmpeg development discussions and patches Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: ffmpeg-devel-bounces@ffmpeg.org Sender: "ffmpeg-devel" Archived-At: List-Archive: List-Post: On 1/25/23, Jean-Baptiste Kempf wrote: > On Wed, 25 Jan 2023, at 22:03, Marton Balint wrote: >> On Wed, 25 Jan 2023, Jean-Baptiste Kempf wrote: >> >>> On Wed, 25 Jan 2023, at 21:08, Marton Balint wrote: >>>> On Wed, 25 Jan 2023, James Almer wrote: >>>> >>>>> On 1/24/2023 12:45 PM, Anton Khirnov wrote: >>>>>> So to summarize the discussion so far: >>>>>> >>>>>> * nobody is strongly arguing for an instability period after the >>>>>> bump, >>>>>> and there are good reasons against it, therefore we should NOT >>>>>> have >>>>>> one >>>>>> >>>>>> * the bump can be done either as bump-then-remove or >>>>>> remove-then-bump >>>>>> * there are advantages and disadvantages for both of those, >>>>>> nobody >>>>>> expressed a strong preference for either, so you can keep this >>>>>> as >>>>>> is >>>>>> >>>>>> Please correct me if I misunderstood or missed something, or >>>>>> somebody >>>>>> has a new opinion. >>>>> >>>>> Since the instability period doesn't seem popular, if anyone has some >>>>> patches >>>>> for ABI changes (enum value or field offset changes, removing avpriv_ >>>>> functions we forgot about, etc), then please send them asap so i can >>>>> push >>>>> them all at the same time. >>>> >>>> Ok, I can send the frame number changes tomorrow. When do you plan to >>>> do >>>> the actual bump? I assumed the last 5.x release should be branched >>>> first. >>> >>> Why? 5.1 was already branched out. >> >> And is missing 6 months of development. > > So you want us to release both 6.0 and 5.2 at the same time? > I don't get it. So user do not need to immediately update code that uses old API to get new fancy features. > > -- > Jean-Baptiste Kempf - President > +33 672 704 734 > _______________________________________________ > ffmpeg-devel mailing list > ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org > https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel > > To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email > ffmpeg-devel-request@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe". > _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-devel-request@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".