Re: [FFmpeg-devel] FATE Errors

[Paul B Mahol <onemda@gmail.com>]

On Fri, May 27, 2022 at 11:11 PM Soft Works <softworkz@hotmail.com> wrote:

>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: ffmpeg-devel <ffmpeg-devel-bounces@ffmpeg.org> On Behalf Of
> > Andreas Rheinhardt
> > Sent: Saturday, April 30, 2022 10:02 PM
> > To: ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
> > Subject: Re: [FFmpeg-devel] FATE Errors
> >
> > James Almer:
> > >
> > >
> > > On 4/30/2022 4:06 PM, Andreas Rheinhardt wrote:
> > >> Soft Works:
> > >>> Hi,
> > >>>
> > >>> is it a known issue that the current head of the master branch
> > has
> > >>> FATE errors?
> > >>>
> > >>> I get the same locally as well as on the automated GitHub build.
> > >>> One is this:
> > >>>
> > >>> --- ./tests/ref/vsynth/vsynth2-mpeg2-422 2022-04-30
> > >>> 14:23:44.330424058 +0000
> > >>> +++ tests/data/fate/vsynth2-mpeg2-422 2022-04-30
> > 14:38:41.071678201
> > >>> +0000
> > >>> @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
> > >>> -b2fa9b73c3547191ecc01b8163abd4e5
> > >>> *tests/data/fate/vsynth2-mpeg2-422.mpeg2video
> > >>> -379164 tests/data/fate/vsynth2-mpeg2-422.mpeg2video
> > >>> -704f6a96f93c2409219bd48b74169041
> > >>> *tests/data/fate/vsynth2-mpeg2-422.out.rawvideo
> > >>> -stddev: 4.17 PSNR: 35.73 MAXDIFF: 70 bytes: 7603200/ 7603200
> > >>> +8f6d565723ccf879ab2b5aa910b7ce21
> > >>> *tests/data/fate/vsynth2-mpeg2-422.mpeg2video
> > >>> +380544 tests/data/fate/vsynth2-mpeg2-422.mpeg2video
> > >>> +0797fddea4835687dedddebbbe98fa8f
> > >>> *tests/data/fate/vsynth2-mpeg2-422.out.rawvideo
> > >>> +stddev: 4.16 PSNR: 35.73 MAXDIFF: 75 bytes: 7603200/ 7603200
> > >>> Test vsynth2-mpeg2-422 failed. Look at
> > >>> tests/data/fate/vsynth2-mpeg2-422.err for details.
> > >>> make: *** [tests/Makefile:277: fate-vsynth2-mpeg2-422] Error 1
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>> Is anybody seeing the same?
> > >>>
> > >>> Thanks,
> > >>> sw
> > >>
> > >> http://fate.ffmpeg.org/ doesn't show recent regressions and FATE
> > is fine
> > >> for me locally. I recently made changes to FATE (namely the test
> > >> requirements, vcodec.mak (where the vsynth-tests reside) among the
> > files
> > >> affected), so I am interested in whether the failing tests are
> > >> concentrated on the files recently changed by me (it would
> > obviously not
> > >> haved pushed them if I knew them to cause issues; also patchwork
> > was
> > >> fine).
> > >> Are these issues reproducible? Can you bisect them?
> > >>
> > >> - Andreas
> > >
> > > This may be the alignment issue introduced in lavfi in
> > >
> > https://git.videolan.org/?p=ffmpeg.git;a=commitdiff;h=17a59a634c39b00
> > a680c6ebbaea58db95594d13d
> > > assuming it was not fixed.
> > > I think it only affected targets where av_cpu_max_align() returned
> > 64.
> >
> > You are completely right: Just making av_cpu_max_align return 64
> > allows
> > to reproduce the issue. And it has nothing to do with my recent FATE
> > patches (545e87f49dc9fa5b880e330fc4e1854df68cc0f1 would be the only
> > contender for changes).
> >
>
>
> I found that the FATE errors can be avoided by using
>
> ./configure --disable-avx512
>
> Yet, I hope it will be fixed at some time..
>

I hope you will post a fix for it soon.


>
>
> softworkz
> _______________________________________________
> ffmpeg-devel mailing list
> ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
> https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
>
> To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email
> ffmpeg-devel-request@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
>
_______________________________________________
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel

To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email
ffmpeg-devel-request@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".