From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from ffbox0-bg.mplayerhq.hu (ffbox0-bg.ffmpeg.org [79.124.17.100]) by master.gitmailbox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E227242A7F for ; Tue, 12 Apr 2022 09:26:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [127.0.1.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ffbox0-bg.mplayerhq.hu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 66BAB68B3DB; Tue, 12 Apr 2022 12:26:53 +0300 (EEST) Received: from mail-yb1-f169.google.com (mail-yb1-f169.google.com [209.85.219.169]) by ffbox0-bg.mplayerhq.hu (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F322468B35A for ; Tue, 12 Apr 2022 12:26:46 +0300 (EEST) Received: by mail-yb1-f169.google.com with SMTP id q19so1056010ybd.6 for ; Tue, 12 Apr 2022 02:26:46 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=mB7QBNeEVO5CyjIygstv7z+nDaeBRu5zMIZ7zl3G6r8=; b=DH3zsYw0dq9qUysQgS/2ABTMAgSWKARDaavXOe5J9P1Tv4uiLJFn5zCf87a6ZhN/R+ lre1Jx1p3kZ/w6cmq9qOwpIfKuTbxvm89OYyxB8M2Xxey8ooKFFcdrNOTMO/mHso1LbX W+i2IYt/L3D5wtXpAxdXvLhOXUjVfaxRPcI7gZmtRtdmrHW3MAu/2eK9aNtkvjarcOnz biDb3fuaPKFK/4S6b5sI3joYdda7Vea/tvMuhgyom5JhfJ7O6VTST5Y23rCoJTTxsgME 7AHNrUOWa5wHPuVjei/V1Imw5eU7RfwVsGE0HgtBRUy4GQiRkmUAxSiZO7jzkcIzj3mx 17cA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=mB7QBNeEVO5CyjIygstv7z+nDaeBRu5zMIZ7zl3G6r8=; b=QGl7QYaHYTWNOJbufAU3h6baUH30cjYIQCvf2JQqBT7MkmTfZQUs9VrI/SzOydUkDl P74YZRjh/gHETn8a119mOowC0aTokggVl0xG2aMjk2HqlSfIMkE8JI6zOP+Bs1T0QDJP hP5GHNOgm6eT/NA1SenEXqlF08b07Jghu9EcmC83VHjgLR6v6lMbRXTtFNMs+OG+Ksa2 QN11BzwylqRjxGXvQN9f86PnVpSEkTSSsBwT4ftSMJ7001QnrsNybAQEyqml7C7ntZiE gMhwxKalX1Abrc1AQpS9Cyfjfp66VtegQub84uqg9hWEKgdfc9aLHVZYvkesNt/2qSCa lHoQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530Ds7K3FS0VeIwsfduMTecknF+MnR4RJk6SLgLAJXwcxMl+bONy v/MJYrGzHzx7H477dQvewFGVMCHduPuwBmSQenEjpXUU X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzENGN3g1nK67It3fgeBtc5JVAgOh/fPb6Lo8rMX2n9x7SYVLMX+8V0m1emaQbK43Dv7C4tO/4KojyDP5ZA1Ew= X-Received: by 2002:a25:9743:0:b0:640:4741:4dc5 with SMTP id h3-20020a259743000000b0064047414dc5mr13861150ybo.250.1649755605659; Tue, 12 Apr 2022 02:26:45 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20220404113037.13070-1-anton@khirnov.net> <20220405191542.GV2829255@pb2> <164918796468.24258.6158464741625303482@lain.red.khirnov.net> <164923451378.24258.12863595879743109558@lain.red.khirnov.net> <164932035193.21047.13588447156789154824@lain.red.khirnov.net> <164966573624.21047.5872909837014503123@lain.red.khirnov.net> In-Reply-To: From: Paul B Mahol Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2022 11:29:02 +0200 Message-ID: To: FFmpeg development discussions and patches X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.29 Subject: Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [RFC] Switching ffmpeg.c to a threaded architecture X-BeenThere: ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: FFmpeg development discussions and patches List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: FFmpeg development discussions and patches Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: ffmpeg-devel-bounces@ffmpeg.org Sender: "ffmpeg-devel" Archived-At: List-Archive: List-Post: On Mon, Apr 11, 2022 at 10:58 PM Soft Works wrote: > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: ffmpeg-devel On Behalf Of Paul > > B Mahol > > Sent: Monday, April 11, 2022 10:52 PM > > To: FFmpeg development discussions and patches > devel@ffmpeg.org> > > Subject: Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [RFC] Switching ffmpeg.c to a threaded > > architecture > > > > On Mon, Apr 11, 2022 at 10:10 PM Soft Works > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > From: ffmpeg-devel On Behalf Of > > > > Anton Khirnov > > > > Sent: Monday, April 11, 2022 10:29 AM > > > > To: FFmpeg development discussions and patches > > > devel@ffmpeg.org> > > > > Subject: Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [RFC] Switching ffmpeg.c to a threaded > > > > architecture > > > > > > > > Quoting Soft Works (2022-04-08 17:27:10) > > > > > > Furthermore, remember that this is just the first step. There > > will > > > > be > > > > > > further patchsets converting the other components. I intend to > > > > > > upstream > > > > > > them gradually one after the other. Your suggestion would > > require > > > > me > > > > > > to > > > > > > instead write the whole thing at once, fighting rebase > > conflicts > > > > all > > > > > > the > > > > > > way, and then submit it as a giant utterly unreviewable > > patchset. > > > > > > > > > > That's not what I meant, but anyway it's not worth discussing > > when > > > > > it's a minority opinion. > > > > > > > > > > Just a practical question instead for planning purposes: > > > > > > > > > > Which timeframe do you expect for the whole process? > > > > > When do you plan to start > > > > > > > > If you mean "start pushing the patches", then I intend to do that > > as > > > > they are reviewed and approved. I hope to send the upstreamable > > > > version > > > > of this set this week, if nobody has strong objectsions then I > > might > > > > push it after vacation, i.e. late April/early May. > > > > > > > > > and for how long do you think it will take until all further > > > > patchsets > > > > > will be submitted/applied? > > > > > > > > This is very hard to estimate accurately. A pessimistic guess > > assuming > > > > I > > > > get stuck on every stupid thing would be end of this year, but I > > hope > > > > for things to go much faster. > > > > > > Thanks for the reply. I'm asking because I need to decide about the > > > way I'm going to proceed with the subtitle filtering patchset. > > > > > > I think I will have to keep and continue this in private during this > > > procedure as I don't have the resources to regularly adapt and sync > > > from my (5.0 based) working branch back to the master branch. > > > > > > > > That is big waste of resource when not implementing thing properly. > > From my point of view, somebody who has never given any detailed > reviews, didn't state what exactly(!) he would consider to be "improper" > and never made any suggestion how the implementation would need to > be changed to become "proper" - doesn't have the right to make such > claims. > You never asked kindly. > > softworkz > > > > _______________________________________________ > ffmpeg-devel mailing list > ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org > https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel > > To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email > ffmpeg-devel-request@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe". > _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-devel-request@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".