Git Inbox Mirror of the ffmpeg-devel mailing list - see https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Paul B Mahol <onemda@gmail.com>
To: FFmpeg development discussions and patches <ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org>
Subject: Re: [FFmpeg-devel] Query from Reuters on XZ, open source, and Microsoft
Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2024 01:46:26 +0200
Message-ID: <CAPYw7P6dHv5kPLK-sxByQDy980iawv8Z_6J2urBwfxi4V0berw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CABWZ6ORy4wCnzjdGdJ=gqngxrtbudBid5Oh+MEAm-U5t44BFXQ@mail.gmail.com>

On Tue, Apr 9, 2024 at 10:57 PM Romain Beauxis <romain.beauxis@gmail.com>
wrote:

> [Apologies for continuing the conversation, Rémi]
>
> Le mar. 9 avr. 2024 à 14:05, Tomas Härdin <git@haerdin.se> a écrit :
>
> > mån 2024-04-08 klockan 13:13 -0500 skrev Romain Beauxis:
> > > On Wed, Apr 3, 2024, 11:39 Kieran Kunhya via ffmpeg-devel <
> > > ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi Raphael,
> > > >
> > > > I was the author of the tweet and I gave a short talk about this
> > > > topic at
> > > > Demuxed at a video conference last year:
> > > > https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=OIyOEuQQsCQ&t=930s
> > > >
> > > > That said this is a community project and it would be best to
> > > > continue the
> > > > discussion on this mailing list unless agreed otherwise.
> > > >
> > >
> > > Thank you for sharing your talk. It's indeed unfortunate that large
> > > companies are not more generous with the projects they depend on
> > > _heavily_
> > >
> > > I would like to offer a constructive feedback really not intended as
> > > trolling. I believe that supporting a more modern development
> > > workflow such
> > > as the GitHub PR or gitlab MR would go very long way in helping
> > > onboarding
> > > new developers.
> >
> > Considering which company owns GitHub and which company was the target
> > of Kieran's criticism, this seems ill-adviced
> >
>
> Would you mind explaining what you mean exactly? I want to respond but I'm
> not sure if I fully understand your point here.
>
>
Kieran's criticism is trolling, as Kieran and rest of FFmpeg devs use
regularly and passionately Various Big Corpo products all the time.

Kieran's criticism is unfounded one. As I, originally 'volunteered' in that
now 'famous' ticket about Certain Big Corpo bug report and kindly replied
in friendly manner to bug reporter and give reporter free support, me still
see no issues in that mine action.

I strictly do make difference between collective and single specific person.


>
> > Also as someone who had to maintain a Gitlab instance at uni for a
> > couple of years, I agree with Rémi's points
> >
>
> My initial contribution was motivated by the argument presented in the
> original talk that bringing new blood is critical to the survival of the
> project.
>

Projects go and die, and new ones rise up, all the time.


>
> If so, then I do believe that there must be a compromise to be made between
> being easier to join for new developers and changing the existing workflow.
> I'm also aware that changing the existing workflow has been discussed
> before.
>
> I don't think that media is not cool anymore, as argued in the talk. I see
> a _lot_ of interested developers in my other projects and all over the open
> source landscape. That's why I believe that it's also important to consider
> other reasons than the talk's argument.
>
> Being someone actually trying to contribute, with years of developers
> experience and involvement in other communities, I was thinking that I may
> be able to bring in more new context to the topic.
>
> If there's interest in continuing the discussion, could you or Rémi be
> willing to explain what kind of burden gitlab would add?
>

Infrastructure maintenance, no volunteers for gitlab repo admin.
Extra steps to setup account and X-factor authentication.


>
> Also, Rémi said this would make it harder to join the project, in which way
> exactly?
>
> Otherwise, I'm happy to let this die and return to trying to get my patch
> committed.. 🙂
>
> Thanks,
> -- Romain
> _______________________________________________
> ffmpeg-devel mailing list
> ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
> https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
>
> To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email
> ffmpeg-devel-request@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
>
_______________________________________________
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel

To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email
ffmpeg-devel-request@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".

  reply	other threads:[~2024-04-09 23:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-04-03 15:51 Satter, Raphael (Reuters) via ffmpeg-devel
2024-04-03 16:38 ` Kieran Kunhya via ffmpeg-devel
2024-04-03 16:42   ` [FFmpeg-devel] [EXT] " Satter, Raphael (Reuters) via ffmpeg-devel
2024-04-03 19:26   ` Satter, Raphael (Reuters) via ffmpeg-devel
2024-04-03 19:43     ` Kieran Kunhya via ffmpeg-devel
2024-04-08 11:02     ` Tomas Härdin
2024-04-08 14:40       ` Nicolas George
2024-04-08 17:56         ` Paul B Mahol
2024-04-09 19:08         ` Tomas Härdin
2024-04-17 19:05         ` [FFmpeg-devel] Mailinglist conduct (was: [EXT] Re: Query from Reuters on XZ, open source, and Microsoft) Ronald S. Bultje
2024-04-08 18:13   ` [FFmpeg-devel] Query from Reuters on XZ, open source, and Microsoft Romain Beauxis
2024-04-08 21:29     ` Vittorio Giovara
2024-04-09  3:09     ` Rémi Denis-Courmont
2024-04-09  8:36       ` Nicolas George
2024-04-10  9:27         ` Stefano Sabatini
2024-04-10 13:15           ` Gyan Doshi
2024-04-09 19:05     ` Tomas Härdin
2024-04-09 20:57       ` Romain Beauxis
2024-04-09 23:46         ` Paul B Mahol [this message]
2024-04-10  1:43           ` Romain Beauxis
2024-04-10 12:40           ` Ronald S. Bultje
2024-04-10 11:38         ` Tomas Härdin
2024-04-11  1:19         ` Michael Niedermayer
2024-04-11  3:59           ` Vittorio Giovara
2024-04-11  7:27             ` Paul B Mahol
2024-04-17 19:24             ` epirat07

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CAPYw7P6dHv5kPLK-sxByQDy980iawv8Z_6J2urBwfxi4V0berw@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=onemda@gmail.com \
    --cc=ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

Git Inbox Mirror of the ffmpeg-devel mailing list - see https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel

This inbox may be cloned and mirrored by anyone:

	git clone --mirror https://master.gitmailbox.com/ffmpegdev/0 ffmpegdev/git/0.git

	# If you have public-inbox 1.1+ installed, you may
	# initialize and index your mirror using the following commands:
	public-inbox-init -V2 ffmpegdev ffmpegdev/ https://master.gitmailbox.com/ffmpegdev \
		ffmpegdev@gitmailbox.com
	public-inbox-index ffmpegdev

Example config snippet for mirrors.


AGPL code for this site: git clone https://public-inbox.org/public-inbox.git