Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] lavc: remove the QOA decoder

[Paul B Mahol <onemda@gmail.com>]

On Thu, Dec 21, 2023 at 8:43 PM Tomas Härdin <git@haerdin.se> wrote:

> ons 2023-12-20 klockan 20:11 +0100 skrev Michael Niedermayer:
> > On Wed, Dec 20, 2023 at 05:57:40PM +0100, Tomas Härdin wrote:
> > > tis 2023-12-19 klockan 15:02 +0100 skrev Nicolas George:
> > [...]
> > > [...] , but every line of code
> > > carries with it a non-zero maintenance burden
> >
> > Assuming you mean with "non-zero" a "larger than zero" maintenance
> > burden
> >
> > then we can proof this to be false
>
> Doubt
>
> > What iam trying to say is, the maintaince burden resulting from a
> > change
> > is complex
>
> Indeed
>
> > In this specific case here we have a patch proposing the removial of
> > a decoder
> > missing a test.
> > Its easy to say the burden is less when the decoder is removed
> > But its author recently left the project too
>
> This is one problem. But the careless attitude to shoving more features
> into the codebase is far more serious. Every line of code is a CVE
> waiting to happen. Apparently this is a difficult thing to grasp for
> some contributors. It's an attitude I expect only from junior
> developers.
>
> Ensuring C code is correct and safe is *hard*. I have spent time
> formally verifying embedded C code for spaceflight. The lessons learned
> from this has made me supremely suspicious of cowboy coding.
>
> I have raised this issue multiple times in this project to no avail. I
> do not expect things to change.
>

Say what serious feature you contributed ? - Nothing.
_______________________________________________
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel

To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email
ffmpeg-devel-request@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".