From: Paul B Mahol <onemda@gmail.com> To: FFmpeg development discussions and patches <ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org> Subject: Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] lavfi: get rid of FF_INTERNAL_FIELDS Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2023 15:14:13 +0100 Message-ID: <CAPYw7P5VbHXcCspU2g4BezuEL+Ngn_zTQTwQwW2S234sqoQ7eA@mail.gmail.com> (raw) In-Reply-To: <Y9kftqVrRRKxQ7Qo@phare.normalesup.org> On 1/31/23, Nicolas George <george@nsup.org> wrote: > Anton Khirnov (12023-01-31): >> I find this a significant improvement in code quality, making it easier >> to maintain. > > You can say that, you do not maintain it. > >> Making it obvious which field is private and which is public is a >> feature, not a bug. > > Then I do not want this feature. Making people expend effort for no > reason at all. > >> I'll also note that >> - we've been switching to this precise pattern everywhere else in the >> project > > Well, too bad. > >> - the most prolific lavfi contributor recently (Paul) has no objections >> to this patch >> - the second most prolific lavfi contributor recently (Andreas) told me >> on IRC he planned to write this same patch himself > > It is not a matter of volume, it is a matter of complexity. Since > Stefano is no longer involved in the coding, I am the only one who knows > how the tricky bits of libavfilter work. No, you do not. Calling your libavfilter framework code "complex" is disgrace to really complex code in non-framework part of libavfilter or else in FFmpeg libraries. libavfilter framework needs serious overhaul. It have numerous limitations and other stuff too much exposed to user, that really should not be. You do not maintain code at all, you just block patches and never contribute anymore anything useful besides blocking patches. > >> So if you insist on objecting to this patch, it seems to me that a vote >> would be in order. > > Well, go ahead, but please be aware that a vote cannot force me to > maintain that code. > > If this project goes over my objections “that patch makes my maintenance > work harder”, then be very careful to involve in your plans “find > somebody else willing to debug the code of libavfilter”. Good luck. > > In fact, I think I will take it very easy with maintenance duty until > further notice. I am really fed up with the direction this project is > taking. Authoritarianism, that was the other side of the fork, and we > all know what happened there. And who is to blame. > > -- > Nicolas George > _______________________________________________ > ffmpeg-devel mailing list > ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org > https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel > > To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email > ffmpeg-devel-request@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe". > _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-devel-request@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-01-31 14:14 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2023-01-30 12:29 Anton Khirnov 2023-01-30 12:32 ` Paul B Mahol 2023-01-30 12:40 ` Nicolas George 2023-01-31 13:50 ` Anton Khirnov 2023-01-31 14:03 ` Nicolas George 2023-01-31 14:14 ` Paul B Mahol [this message] 2023-01-31 14:32 ` Nicolas George 2023-01-31 14:50 ` Paul B Mahol 2023-01-31 14:18 ` Anton Khirnov 2023-01-31 14:31 ` Nicolas George 2023-01-31 15:24 ` Anton Khirnov 2023-01-31 16:13 ` Nicolas George 2023-01-31 16:34 ` Nicolas George 2023-01-31 21:02 ` Andreas Rheinhardt 2023-01-31 21:16 ` Nicolas George 2023-02-01 0:31 ` Andreas Rheinhardt 2023-02-01 7:47 ` Nicolas George 2023-02-01 13:48 ` Andreas Rheinhardt 2023-02-03 14:45 ` Nicolas George 2023-02-04 11:09 ` Uoti Urpala 2023-02-04 15:27 ` Andreas Rheinhardt
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=CAPYw7P5VbHXcCspU2g4BezuEL+Ngn_zTQTwQwW2S234sqoQ7eA@mail.gmail.com \ --to=onemda@gmail.com \ --cc=ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Git Inbox Mirror of the ffmpeg-devel mailing list - see https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel This inbox may be cloned and mirrored by anyone: git clone --mirror https://master.gitmailbox.com/ffmpegdev/0 ffmpegdev/git/0.git # If you have public-inbox 1.1+ installed, you may # initialize and index your mirror using the following commands: public-inbox-init -V2 ffmpegdev ffmpegdev/ https://master.gitmailbox.com/ffmpegdev \ ffmpegdev@gitmailbox.com public-inbox-index ffmpegdev Example config snippet for mirrors. AGPL code for this site: git clone https://public-inbox.org/public-inbox.git