From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from ffbox0-bg.mplayerhq.hu (ffbox0-bg.ffmpeg.org [79.124.17.100]) by master.gitmailbox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B8774536E for ; Wed, 25 Jan 2023 21:29:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [127.0.1.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ffbox0-bg.mplayerhq.hu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 75B9468BE1E; Wed, 25 Jan 2023 23:29:44 +0200 (EET) Received: from mail-vs1-f48.google.com (mail-vs1-f48.google.com [209.85.217.48]) by ffbox0-bg.mplayerhq.hu (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 063D168BE09 for ; Wed, 25 Jan 2023 23:29:38 +0200 (EET) Received: by mail-vs1-f48.google.com with SMTP id l125so73047vsc.2 for ; Wed, 25 Jan 2023 13:29:37 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=to:subject:message-id:date:from:references:in-reply-to:mime-version :from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=gDCwUrZQUZ6OMtPTyivXHz5qMrMHmerj200isr/p8Oo=; b=S8YUwHNP7FXqvwa8lBi+cB0+ockLdzINXAdtX5GWPPUKoBUgGvTNs424/nQiFtVzHE xMyt5uXhh6NYOPsQrm4kOVpt6wAYt2bCW9VEDrzW827tl+OWggrEbNgdjPwDLk/FywzN WyHrXHFFERfudPK8820anNxP1f0PTJ2tLJoKBgGN5AdleLCh9s2IFXk6gyG54kmLx9X5 33Y/WBxLxFZN1l3qyH/GC862U6psYcjdImwhs6wnvad6Wo0HTTvImNa5i6kirzbipip6 UszGj3B9KUcdPtGdpmfYm2xQ/22ec2jGi11YXh2zqsGNMkHF/i54SYnUXUBhJ/TI9yiD D/mA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=to:subject:message-id:date:from:references:in-reply-to:mime-version :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=gDCwUrZQUZ6OMtPTyivXHz5qMrMHmerj200isr/p8Oo=; b=s7iYTzjG62sTdoVHcMFUGdVDXLVZjJGaRYgQRPnpHhH2stqKT8OTUsc6vBRq5oO3YI c5MQ5MQ8sjsOS2WnR/zlYGqImHt26GCJaDANT6JtZs9+c6kaTEytQffk5DmPKIc2BSEL D5RfaYCL0Mk/LigKw+didvqWbp62q293cXmaNW7uGN3UQk+vL7BELWLi+IGgyzGgkfXg ZWZCDWYOeIA7F1q9IkzDRACYThj90r3nDlNEpXhuV1OKWTvICmu9ehwWrGZZPNhdBXPG IkVgAodjEiQngHG1YHmU0FM/Pnc4i2umi+1pFDzfvmiWkakVdX+T61T0ARXt61PQ5A/A kLVg== X-Gm-Message-State: AO0yUKV5vXZcqw9KICpIrieoH1mUzCBONdWAofVpb1pXF502ESH4yr0a FCNaZp9V24mPUaJd8TDbhuIcFAcdgKXgX8hwpRp2Vk62 X-Google-Smtp-Source: AK7set+41D802e8HUz4baVBDcMpE3UKFMh4qUijOYrXbFDGcJZrTqUUr/1bcWKag1WBRSn1G/UCGHb6zxXnin4jXsRo= X-Received: by 2002:a67:d092:0:b0:3e8:43d8:9a47 with SMTP id s18-20020a67d092000000b003e843d89a47mr538777vsi.15.1674682176726; Wed, 25 Jan 2023 13:29:36 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 2002:a05:612c:2428:b0:32a:5eaa:92e4 with HTTP; Wed, 25 Jan 2023 13:29:35 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <20230116133840.512-1-jamrial@gmail.com> <167457514256.4503.7425182589774123747@lain.khirnov.net> <6b01240d-95e2-db84-c40b-329a72b958c5@gmail.com> <7debdfb5-bbb3-e4c6-f95-a89a463d3abd@passwd.hu> <4997c7ce-3db3-4062-b3b4-f65719debc43@betaapp.fastmail.com> From: Paul B Mahol Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2023 22:29:35 +0100 Message-ID: To: FFmpeg development discussions and patches Subject: Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH 00/26] Major library version bump X-BeenThere: ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: FFmpeg development discussions and patches List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: FFmpeg development discussions and patches Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: ffmpeg-devel-bounces@ffmpeg.org Sender: "ffmpeg-devel" Archived-At: List-Archive: List-Post: On 1/25/23, Jean-Baptiste Kempf wrote: > > > On Wed, 25 Jan 2023, at 22:20, Paul B Mahol wrote: >> On 1/25/23, Jean-Baptiste Kempf wrote: >>> On Wed, 25 Jan 2023, at 22:03, Marton Balint wrote: >>>> On Wed, 25 Jan 2023, Jean-Baptiste Kempf wrote: >>>> >>>>> On Wed, 25 Jan 2023, at 21:08, Marton Balint wrote: >>>>>> On Wed, 25 Jan 2023, James Almer wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> On 1/24/2023 12:45 PM, Anton Khirnov wrote: >>>>>>>> So to summarize the discussion so far: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> * nobody is strongly arguing for an instability period after the >>>>>>>> bump, >>>>>>>> and there are good reasons against it, therefore we should NOT >>>>>>>> have >>>>>>>> one >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> * the bump can be done either as bump-then-remove or >>>>>>>> remove-then-bump >>>>>>>> * there are advantages and disadvantages for both of those, >>>>>>>> nobody >>>>>>>> expressed a strong preference for either, so you can keep >>>>>>>> this >>>>>>>> as >>>>>>>> is >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Please correct me if I misunderstood or missed something, or >>>>>>>> somebody >>>>>>>> has a new opinion. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Since the instability period doesn't seem popular, if anyone has >>>>>>> some >>>>>>> patches >>>>>>> for ABI changes (enum value or field offset changes, removing >>>>>>> avpriv_ >>>>>>> functions we forgot about, etc), then please send them asap so i can >>>>>>> push >>>>>>> them all at the same time. >>>>>> >>>>>> Ok, I can send the frame number changes tomorrow. When do you plan to >>>>>> do >>>>>> the actual bump? I assumed the last 5.x release should be branched >>>>>> first. >>>>> >>>>> Why? 5.1 was already branched out. >>>> >>>> And is missing 6 months of development. >>> >>> So you want us to release both 6.0 and 5.2 at the same time? >>> I don't get it. >> >> So user do not need to immediately update code that uses old API to >> get new fancy features. > > And when do you stop doing this? After 6.0 tagged. > Also, as 5.1 is LTS, is 5.2 LTS too? > No, its not. > -- > Jean-Baptiste Kempf - President > +33 672 704 734 > _______________________________________________ > ffmpeg-devel mailing list > ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org > https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel > > To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email > ffmpeg-devel-request@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe". > _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-devel-request@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".