From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from ffbox0-bg.mplayerhq.hu (ffbox0-bg.ffmpeg.org [79.124.17.100]) by master.gitmailbox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D145B4938F for ; Thu, 8 Feb 2024 18:53:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [127.0.1.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ffbox0-bg.mplayerhq.hu (Postfix) with ESMTP id E4F2168D145; Thu, 8 Feb 2024 20:53:01 +0200 (EET) Received: from mail-lf1-f52.google.com (mail-lf1-f52.google.com [209.85.167.52]) by ffbox0-bg.mplayerhq.hu (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 941C468CA86 for ; Thu, 8 Feb 2024 20:52:55 +0200 (EET) Received: by mail-lf1-f52.google.com with SMTP id 2adb3069b0e04-5116063585aso128492e87.1 for ; Thu, 08 Feb 2024 10:52:55 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1707418371; x=1708023171; darn=ffmpeg.org; h=to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=iMj+jzokZIsgY7ILpLw8FaPZMESbBXTZBLcLLBLVbMg=; b=d6z9lR6YAI/3S6tU6YxOdNY+iZotiugbpwstj1hrAHlW93I8l7XwKjnposOYNuxBEG swUMSwpS951HDVZw4WiFx5tJwZyEtehSEJu+MFo0hVrAlxb8TumilV+0il6840gtN7Db 8OyDY49YwtZ3FanTl8FHqt08MpgjGrG6b98qKfFepFuVNkyNnbvNWWqR3b+fRvjCvD/I LOmBnhQH5Kp+OF+OjiZBhxEwiIhYj2B38GGBUa/tTYGZxhpXxrzxzjcQNmBG7/6FMMMn ioU033YH3b57ShIkITJ+fG6LVky+wVj5oYzimT4EK3w82IX8mBQvx85if2GSrsoNnS1i 9wkA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1707418371; x=1708023171; h=to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=iMj+jzokZIsgY7ILpLw8FaPZMESbBXTZBLcLLBLVbMg=; b=orsNKlelvtrAQsuLnRUc1Jjphpnrb7gEhLAoPoEetaK5F0x/oNoZxP+eUPKOtPIwk/ IesHqsb58S3RFZcqxXio+TO8yZ9EAgANePt7FbmFPn6fV0H9C0uwAhFyBmR+pajSmSo+ rskKNDgf7Bw6xDDTQ4pcRfFNOqhtCNdNWmAuRK1Y5QSbNy96Mt1HvedLxUmF8skr1qMz 9MUXXHLvFmFWUT/+lKBubNTWVq+6XtWr7fSfqx70K4T38kKVziyVcADFOEiqt/QFLuuN 0iavPYY67IKw1WiqBDDwMTbk7ST+fk7w4HzkZwuHQorQYStSn9jZpjnVSJgR82hzPX9J uAfw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YzPETCnw8xdXnRxArACBHMR7lV1Tq0yB5NsagUjEsS6CzJabFVT P6hydCKJCukA3vTNqtYn6KarO7cZIV69GCGdvg+nuRFp8Htt4Op+/JTWg6+uuZIjfTlPsDq0+PR 8SWgwHVBPnULu2HvJM0qqY1wGucXj3WDN X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IFtbmg8Mw5C7cOIE8Opav5fqcQYXiDxp9PqTiiQTWNromVcDHKxTcWKFLPCcwqXKoOgD44ZEPdkb+BKT0iE17I= X-Received: by 2002:ac2:57c9:0:b0:511:636b:f80d with SMTP id k9-20020ac257c9000000b00511636bf80dmr89677lfo.19.1707418371417; Thu, 08 Feb 2024 10:52:51 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20240205195802.14522-2-anton@khirnov.net> <20240205202727.GT6420@pb2> <170716510563.8914.15857303686551471840@lain.khirnov.net> <20240205204510.GU6420@pb2> <170729971000.8914.8781282694582073579@lain.khirnov.net> <2E73439B-3AE5-46FC-80FB-2D375FD852C5@cosmin.at> <0101018d84ea30db-c4e65518-ce86-436d-8a69-df75847f7c8d-000000@us-west-2.amazonses.com> <1CBFE199-B1ED-47B5-BD97-7DA715EAB55B@cosmin.at> <0101018d8568a406-3e21bde1-a8ac-477a-a2fa-05be3c8461f4-000000@us-west-2.amazonses.com> <8C790A7E-A236-4413-A4EB-AFE2F91E96A8@cosmin.at> <0101018d86255500-5b78df10-2b31-45ae-8a0a-3965f641453f-000000@us-west-2.amazonses.com> In-Reply-To: From: Sean McGovern Date: Thu, 8 Feb 2024 13:52:39 -0500 Message-ID: To: FFmpeg development discussions and patches X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.29 Subject: Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH 2/2] Require compilers to support C17. X-BeenThere: ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: FFmpeg development discussions and patches List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: FFmpeg development discussions and patches Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: ffmpeg-devel-bounces@ffmpeg.org Sender: "ffmpeg-devel" Archived-At: List-Archive: List-Post: Hi developers, On Wed, Feb 7, 2024, 23:30 Jean-Baptiste Kempf wrote: > Hello, > > On Thu, 8 Feb 2024, at 01:36, Cosmin Stejerean via ffmpeg-devel wrote: > >> There were simply no objections to moving to C11. > >> The C17 plan came about later because it has important bugfixes. > >> It doesn't really matter as compilers backported the new behaviour to > C11 > >> (or rather, they consistently had the same behaviour, but now it became > a standard). > >> > > > > There were no objections to C11, however C17 was brought up and there > > were objections that it's likely too soon and I believe JB proposed > > holding off for a year on C17 (while adopting C11 immediately), which > > My recommendation is still this: > - move to C11 now > - activate C17 on some Fate/CI targets > - recommend C17 compilers modes > - move to C17 at this mid-year when 7.1 is branched (LTS if we follow our > plans) > I like this approach. It's a shame we can't get metrics on who might be genuinely affected by a direct move to C17. I'd be more than willing to host one or more FATE nodes with C17 turned on. Do let me know if this is desirable. -- Sean McGovern > _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-devel-request@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".