From: Manuel Lauss <manuel.lauss@gmail.com> To: FFmpeg development discussions and patches <ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org> Subject: Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH 2/2] avcodec/sanm: avoid using k in left pxoff check Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2025 22:06:28 +0200 Message-ID: <CAOLZvyE2M-C7KSDoNyCqK=tjt2FBZa0ncWL_UuERfjNi+-HFqQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw) In-Reply-To: <20250604110041.GQ29660@pb2> Servus Michael, On Wed, Jun 4, 2025 at 1:00 PM Michael Niedermayer <michael@niedermayer.cc> wrote: > > On Tue, Jun 03, 2025 at 12:30:40PM +0200, Manuel Lauss wrote: > > Servus Michael, > > > > On Sat, May 31, 2025 at 12:51 AM Michael Niedermayer > > <michael@niedermayer.cc> wrote: > > > > > > > > /* smooth top and left block borders with neighbours */ > > > > > > - if (((pxoff - p + k) < 0) || ((pxoff - p + k) >= maxpxo) > > > > > > + if (((pxoff - p + 0) < 0) || ((pxoff - p + k) >= maxpxo) > > > > > > || ((pxoff + 3 * p) < 0) || ((pxoff + 3 * p) >= maxpxo) > > > > > > || (i == 0) || (j == 0)) > > > > > > continue; > > > > > > > > Oops, yes, that change is correct. > > > > > > will apply > > > > > > > > > > I think you should just rip the whole block-smoothing block out > > > > entirely: it creates a "sawtooth" pattern > > > > which is more annoying than the "blockiness" it tries to soften. > > > > > > probably, but i just wanted to fix the out of array access, > > > ill leave improvment beyond that to others > > > > Is it OK if I just remove this block entirely? I'd commit that along > > with the other 2 sanm patches I have. > > i think you dont understand the bug my change is fixing > > Its an out of array access in: > for (k = 0; k < 4; k++) > *(dst + pxoff + k) = ((*(dst + pxoff + k) + *(dst + pxoff - p + k)) >> 1) & 0x7f; > > The hunk: > /* smooth top and left block borders with neighbours */ > if (((pxoff - p + k) < 0) || ((pxoff - p + k) >= maxpxo) > || ((pxoff + 3 * p) < 0) || ((pxoff + 3 * p) >= maxpxo) > || (i == 0) || (j == 0)) > continue; > > skips this code. If the hunk is removed and nothing else is changed > its MORE buggy as there will be more out of array accesses I was thinking about this: diff --git a/libavcodec/sanm.c b/libavcodec/sanm.c index 00bfef00fe..5912a8c14b 100644 --- a/libavcodec/sanm.c +++ b/libavcodec/sanm.c @@ -732,25 +732,6 @@ static int old_codec4(SANMVideoContext *ctx, GetByteContext *gb, int top, int le } pxo2 = pxo2 - 4 + p; } - - /* smooth top and left block borders with neighbours */ - if (((pxoff - p + k) < 0) || ((pxoff - p + k) >= maxpxo) - || ((pxoff + 3 * p) < 0) || ((pxoff + 3 * p) >= maxpxo) - || (i == 0) || (j == 0)) - continue; - if (param & 0x80) { - for (k = 0; k < 4; k++) - *(dst + pxoff + k) = ((*(dst + pxoff + k) + *(dst + pxoff - p + k)) >> 1) | 0x80; - *(dst + pxoff + 1 * p) = (*(dst + pxoff + 1 * p) + *(dst + pxoff + 1 * p - 1)) >> 1 | 0x80; - *(dst + pxoff + 2 * p) = (*(dst + pxoff + 2 * p) + *(dst + pxoff + 2 * p - 1)) >> 1 | 0x80; - *(dst + pxoff + 3 * p) = (*(dst + pxoff + 3 * p) + *(dst + pxoff + 3 * p - 1)) >> 1 | 0x80; - } else { - for (k = 0; k < 4; k++) - *(dst + pxoff + k) = ((*(dst + pxoff + k) + *(dst + pxoff - p + k)) >> 1) & 0x7f; - *(dst + pxoff + 1 * p) = (*(dst + pxoff + 1 * p) + *(dst + pxoff + 1 * p - 1)) >> 1; - *(dst + pxoff + 2 * p) = (*(dst + pxoff + 2 * p) + *(dst + pxoff + 2 * p - 1)) >> 1; - *(dst + pxoff + 3 * p) = (*(dst + pxoff + 3 * p) + *(dst + pxoff + 3 * p - 1)) >> 1; - } } } return 0; Manuel _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-devel-request@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-06-04 20:07 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2025-05-14 1:39 [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH 1/2] avcodec/ffv1enc_template: Fix remaining space check Michael Niedermayer 2025-05-14 1:39 ` [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH 2/2] avcodec/sanm: avoid using k in left pxoff check Michael Niedermayer 2025-05-30 19:52 ` Michael Niedermayer 2025-05-30 20:54 ` Manuel Lauss 2025-05-30 22:51 ` Michael Niedermayer 2025-06-03 10:30 ` Manuel Lauss 2025-06-04 11:00 ` Michael Niedermayer 2025-06-04 20:06 ` Manuel Lauss [this message] 2025-06-04 23:21 ` Michael Niedermayer 2025-05-30 19:49 ` [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH 1/2] avcodec/ffv1enc_template: Fix remaining space check Michael Niedermayer
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to='CAOLZvyE2M-C7KSDoNyCqK=tjt2FBZa0ncWL_UuERfjNi+-HFqQ@mail.gmail.com' \ --to=manuel.lauss@gmail.com \ --cc=ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Git Inbox Mirror of the ffmpeg-devel mailing list - see https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel This inbox may be cloned and mirrored by anyone: git clone --mirror https://master.gitmailbox.com/ffmpegdev/0 ffmpegdev/git/0.git # If you have public-inbox 1.1+ installed, you may # initialize and index your mirror using the following commands: public-inbox-init -V2 ffmpegdev ffmpegdev/ https://master.gitmailbox.com/ffmpegdev \ ffmpegdev@gitmailbox.com public-inbox-index ffmpegdev Example config snippet for mirrors. AGPL code for this site: git clone https://public-inbox.org/public-inbox.git