From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from ffbox0-bg.mplayerhq.hu (ffbox0-bg.ffmpeg.org [79.124.17.100]) by master.gitmailbox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 86DBC40695 for ; Sat, 20 Jan 2024 13:02:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [127.0.1.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ffbox0-bg.mplayerhq.hu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 45CCB68D08A; Sat, 20 Jan 2024 15:02:35 +0200 (EET) Received: from mail-oo1-f50.google.com (mail-oo1-f50.google.com [209.85.161.50]) by ffbox0-bg.mplayerhq.hu (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EECFF68CF01; Sat, 20 Jan 2024 15:02:23 +0200 (EET) Received: by mail-oo1-f50.google.com with SMTP id 006d021491bc7-595d24ad466so1066828eaf.0; Sat, 20 Jan 2024 05:02:23 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1705755742; x=1706360542; darn=ffmpeg.org; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:mime-version:from:to:cc:subject :date:message-id:reply-to; bh=q+L5D5e2a9MhFZy7uggPfMS9BLCdettPXh1LNgKs67o=; b=c7HHkDsKtSv5920z0LubHRoWXKDeyz6c5Iil24ODPkHpEiKWc6DW/7ep+xcliZHwi5 CeaQaQqlSm75UIKPqsZG7OPUrXq+3Ph1qdZzVBPGh5OwxDW6Gmj0cVNmNMJ8FrHQQBD0 grBIbT4GZMhP4IUFV7xbPg0aa1mdLQ7l3btdypXGJ4xXvwUjmbkWppyKtOYjIdyUtN+4 TczDIVeTN1pcx1TqjH4yim6FrELNB+1Hz6pLJH3nLDv8DYUPSxGuOlIajFBJYAhsAd51 0cHC74/ZS6gbt3JFG+N85lTlDU5LE6xZYskBGmKwtSpD09+GIoly/Jh9uJrUjtH6qkAS 9EOg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1705755742; x=1706360542; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:mime-version:x-gm-message-state :from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=q+L5D5e2a9MhFZy7uggPfMS9BLCdettPXh1LNgKs67o=; b=imQWPsVrT5jneIiUCW+A2fu2ps1cOT8YaNHZ5mvtpfJ6DKR21h2mx6sCYJF/2adE3V szHtq/kdjh1qA4AVldWIKoqv2eoM5payHsYS56p/nQilcVFb7i1gCRCMolxOS6ZK5sq3 wPdDiSBO+w9PL5hhEBY+hT5f4YIyMK3cpUYvS0w+2+9l6NMf8R26WkwbqhjXrAkJtbzL yrRgBD+NwMkFrDrfyN+gWxJ4Wji5I8342zDnJAAXGrIZvB4Fo7EfTQFsqZULnyJbJMSz NMi9FqFdWc1WhZCnNuPO8gX0jMRKLTMXxz4ffBY7V2R10eJQGoNwGABjyEM51QhA61kZ pO/g== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yw9a3cecFXpdZjm141hK3em9oQ+RfJw2uGzfR9KPfonsHuc8oxu bPvtQXRg0kt0bwCEpd694J3+BhjWq3gPcDXgGhJkR5Ig1Q2/gTaQTjiyh65iXQ9LxnbsWlEp6Dg sMESecmGh1Ov8+vz0l2oL9Fj6//srlM91olY= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IFixaIvsaGJE6ajm11VU5sPUuBy4ON3oPYzjHNCeIkeqlRoiuPxO2+sFdh+yPOzBvEPrDvkGOD9/nSdPeiao7Y= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6358:7e50:b0:176:454:c8e0 with SMTP id p16-20020a0563587e5000b001760454c8e0mr1312214rwm.24.1705755741415; Sat, 20 Jan 2024 05:02:21 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 From: Dennis Mungai Date: Sat, 20 Jan 2024 16:01:44 +0300 Message-ID: To: FFmpeg user questions X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.29 Subject: [FFmpeg-devel] FFmpeg's HLS muxer's deprecation of the hls_wrap option X-BeenThere: ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: FFmpeg development discussions and patches List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: FFmpeg development discussions and patches Cc: Liu Steven , FFmpeg development discussions and patches Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: ffmpeg-devel-bounces@ffmpeg.org Sender: "ffmpeg-devel" Archived-At: List-Archive: List-Post: Hello, Is there a valid technical reason as to why FFmpeg's HLS muxer dropped the hls_wrap option? There are many cases where the hls_wrap option remains critical so as to preserve the set of output file names without increments. This deprecation breaks that. For now, this behavior can be worked around by switching to the segment muxer and then setting the -segment_wrap option therein, but its' not an ideal solution. Kindly review this deprecation, with an appeal to revert the patchwork that removed the hls_wrap option. Warm regards, Dennis. _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-devel-request@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".