From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from ffbox0-bg.mplayerhq.hu (ffbox0-bg.ffmpeg.org [79.124.17.100]) by master.gitmailbox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DAD1143970 for ; Tue, 3 Jan 2023 00:15:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [127.0.1.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ffbox0-bg.mplayerhq.hu (Postfix) with ESMTP id E3CC568BCE7; Tue, 3 Jan 2023 02:15:55 +0200 (EET) Received: from mail-io1-f46.google.com (mail-io1-f46.google.com [209.85.166.46]) by ffbox0-bg.mplayerhq.hu (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 304A268BCC7 for ; Tue, 3 Jan 2023 02:15:49 +0200 (EET) Received: by mail-io1-f46.google.com with SMTP id v2so15945065ioe.4 for ; Mon, 02 Jan 2023 16:15:49 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=e/LBNhwDcmKs83GVmxVHrg28a+f0bxlRU6e/vrmE6kg=; b=LyalZ4xdnSrpf9ftIabnn+1SLW/mEF/GGrii9g4PTGfMYSIPrO1VMJ4l1DmJIh/T3W 5a/uIeaOf34LUfPJmhzABGFRPkFTgXJqv89fWXs5dwPcWNXGLMr+6KcJ37hCEFv1sstw TpDS3SesciuKZwXMiRv7NrI3Tre2MQ6NJnw/1ZPI2vlmoF8cUZDJMURHmBd3zOzN6m2U ZVCXnmMRQq7qqc9rZUrWwHLrdxJt3BzeHFpZooVU1p2GAKoI+sQRb4svAtF+7v5HWSch jxGMtQvwWO6MZeVqVQNM7hPkWvI2D8NGc/MwNdnxk6+OVTeNGgGwxbAIwiGbvg3AtZVU IhXA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=e/LBNhwDcmKs83GVmxVHrg28a+f0bxlRU6e/vrmE6kg=; b=byVuJlkC/LPCCq4tJgBpnUFr9IQT1n754Ite49iV1F4KFHGiTLraFkvKuO7n6Vcp8i oZTVbmFbuSsd+05qyAzN3P8dyCJvqRtyaRHYG8wOxKxTCa6By5zsVnMNOFIV/ELJsiHS aBlqGq8tDfgRA6MPN997BjR1jlBCXyPN/azrBn9Fjn7Z70GLujdYeFAws7tqhAzWx4ZM mF90CLgnbr1HfCQo7v93T4gdyyOWbs+mc2maaMj6+NxQEiHf7NoAJqeieGMRFgnloQG4 DZIzHuVnQy/UUOpQTB/Z+gGuBE+ryAXfad3aj1D7ZGr266OYOK7+kQs66AA8oD8WcYG+ F3og== X-Gm-Message-State: AFqh2koE7wcEq9e8gPDA13WUnIoqnZYj8D6zLeRvwr4jboPPofu+CLW3 MTZkGioSAshj3BzUqcLsAWrGMl9wnHm4YzSBy//qPJ4Lvmc= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AMrXdXsJUI7FyX0IyEqa3oSOC2j3gbK0r+hWBgEAySDiScMzpxXRuwgB8Bz3/VPnfxSYNSdslI72L5b28CdZWICI4/s= X-Received: by 2002:a6b:7309:0:b0:6e2:c27c:c81f with SMTP id e9-20020a6b7309000000b006e2c27cc81fmr2878644ioh.196.1672704947539; Mon, 02 Jan 2023 16:15:47 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20230102232133.729217-1-philipl@overt.org> <20230102161311.165e61bd@fido7> In-Reply-To: <20230102161311.165e61bd@fido7> From: Dennis Mungai Date: Tue, 3 Jan 2023 03:15:11 +0300 Message-ID: To: Philip Langdale X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.29 Subject: Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH 0/2] Interpolation filter using nvidia OFFRUC Library X-BeenThere: ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: FFmpeg development discussions and patches List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: FFmpeg development discussions and patches Cc: FFmpeg development discussions and patches Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: ffmpeg-devel-bounces@ffmpeg.org Sender: "ffmpeg-devel" Archived-At: List-Archive: List-Post: On Tue, 3 Jan 2023 at 03:13, Philip Langdale wrote: > On Tue, 3 Jan 2023 02:39:19 +0300 > Dennis Mungai wrote: > > > Related, > > > > If this were to be implemented in mpv, can libplacebo pick up this > > feature spec as a filter in ffmpeg? Perhaps that would make such a > > feature easier to merge down the line, instead of re-implementing it > > directly in ffmpeg as an additional filter. > > > > Adding Niklaas to the thread. > > It doesn't make a difference. The licensing is fundamentally unusable > for an open-source project (and there are engineers at nvidia who know > this and wish they could write filters leveraging all their various > capabilities). The only thing with any nuance is what level of > `nonfree` a project is willing to have sitting in their repo. Most > projects (including mpv and libplacebo) would say "none", because it's > not worth the trouble. ffmpeg has gone back and forth on what exact > critera have to be met to qualify as mergeable vs unmergeable nonfree. > In the past we have accepted filters based around nvidia libraries with > prohibitive licensing - see the libnpp based filters, but I don't think > we have the appetite for that now. If we were to decide that this > filter was ok on that basis, I'd merge it, but honestly, the usability > benefit of it being in master is tiny vs all the other hoops you have > to jump through. > > Anyway - punchline: it is not easier to get this kind of thing merged > into other projects. > > --phil > Got it, thanks for the clarifications. _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-devel-request@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".