From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from ffbox0-bg.mplayerhq.hu (ffbox0-bg.ffmpeg.org [79.124.17.100]) by master.gitmailbox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 217C448E72 for ; Mon, 29 Jan 2024 15:03:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [127.0.1.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ffbox0-bg.mplayerhq.hu (Postfix) with ESMTP id F339868D20C; Mon, 29 Jan 2024 17:03:04 +0200 (EET) Received: from mail-pl1-f182.google.com (mail-pl1-f182.google.com [209.85.214.182]) by ffbox0-bg.mplayerhq.hu (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2301768D200 for ; Mon, 29 Jan 2024 17:02:59 +0200 (EET) Received: by mail-pl1-f182.google.com with SMTP id d9443c01a7336-1d7858a469aso14472605ad.2 for ; Mon, 29 Jan 2024 07:02:59 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ob-encoder-com.20230601.gappssmtp.com; s=20230601; t=1706540577; x=1707145377; darn=ffmpeg.org; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=8tVr6toTizbNer9vf5eh4DqkQkwfdCgUUf9GGTjK3/k=; b=VKjWAGqqny3Ir0WcX3rT47Mgu+f3Y97P4XEqyF/Bvemb9e2O9B4ixRrLh8/Fbdv3ES ATA1kRycHESsvGgl4b+YQmDOYcABfMZt44vsQqvQwDZQ/q2ecWmuuo/K6dn9eFt6YUuh Sg1QHnpOOJ/50SEMhTu75a+ZVE2/gVpMIsvpF6g3xocwqkWyQAGYXTtZPhFOnn45d0oV zTCy4sJdQdYMD9h6G/0CLojsyhCzNVM+HGjIEz9fn3Rg3LwzxVpgXzbE3GXevWE8kgQc MLox3yp3Pj/bq6UeF06o8CumGZENuNrPXwzaMZBTgfGuhylIzd58ka8K3ehUfcZnowF3 khcQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1706540577; x=1707145377; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=8tVr6toTizbNer9vf5eh4DqkQkwfdCgUUf9GGTjK3/k=; b=fbWuHMQ5iLC2lDCMmx2x3oDMwaf0POk1Bg5x7tM/0NhlOhJKG2ttPv3rQQfxp5V7dN zNRVFlthjlmnWWPPEadTnac2XguFmuQeB2H3filVZdRP7l9CQDSXnw7u2Cc5VNH0YXrm E4wtNPiLBSzlZSSJTU9FVzIyHQc+VCp9yoIK6Bg14zYFLYJJ26ERwfWJPygpqTrTIh46 nu4gis9b5H0JioQXd2BVM3V8Z0UX98MfpWpD+KNC0K+XRUcrKNUsA8v4BQRksLb1K5zg QJhsv6Tj2G06jLhhB742E2PGX+42J5riPfzDGTR+UAS7WukF+rV4xEPZ7J9ZzIwEK8uB rTrw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yw6sJPhixHNcQhLvAT77I6xGGU4NwCwYon520/daVPhs6Tzuyyv Y2f17Fi8eWOo1qz++xu7hn1LGgXKe3grfk8YgWP+OVD6XBZyNvuwtCAHSffbN+70HKUKD7pZGDn 4OTAB7D/s/6wn4DJdJ6eeoGg/Vj28qzljM8mxdikB5z4iKJLS X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IEoyCbhDxffxfP0MPFagWfvoG77/4QaLmjD9nhYmZiowQb0QkWVzDg0B/gXQTsvf6fU8z3skGc2CCIOO+QeKMQ= X-Received: by 2002:a17:90a:a418:b0:28b:8e2d:4131 with SMTP id y24-20020a17090aa41800b0028b8e2d4131mr2097917pjp.31.1706540577027; Mon, 29 Jan 2024 07:02:57 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20240128032549.GN6420@pb2> <20240128171233.GO6420@pb2> <20240128200620.GP6420@pb2> <20240128213459.GR6420@pb2> In-Reply-To: From: Kieran Kunhya Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2024 15:02:24 +0000 Message-ID: To: "Jonatas L. Nogueira" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.29 Subject: Re: [FFmpeg-devel] Sovereign Tech Fund X-BeenThere: ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: FFmpeg development discussions and patches List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: FFmpeg development discussions and patches Cc: Kieran Kunhya , FFmpeg development discussions and patches Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: ffmpeg-devel-bounces@ffmpeg.org Sender: "ffmpeg-devel" Archived-At: List-Archive: List-Post: > > > >> [...] the GA definitly cannot object to an invoice for a project that > the GA approved previously. > > "The General Assembly is sovereign and legitimate for all its decisions > regarding the FFmpeg project." > > When working with a contract (and a SOW), the General Assembly won't be > able to block an invoice. > Because the General Assembly will already have exercised its sovereignty > before the work started. > And unless the GA becomes a nation, any court of law would uphold the > contract. > In this project, acceptance of a patch is based on the technical contents of a patch, not a few vague paragraphs in a SoW. These decisions are made by the Technical Committee and the General Assembly. Tying the project contractually is unacceptable. There are plenty of "corporate" open source projects where this is fine, but there is a reason we are not one of those full of corporate friendly code like binary blobs, intrinsics, SDKs etc. Kieran > _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-devel-request@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".