From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from ffbox0-bg.mplayerhq.hu (ffbox0-bg.ffmpeg.org [79.124.17.100]) by master.gitmailbox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E84F48C43 for ; Tue, 23 Jan 2024 09:05:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [127.0.1.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ffbox0-bg.mplayerhq.hu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 60C7868C832; Tue, 23 Jan 2024 11:05:33 +0200 (EET) Received: from mail-pg1-f175.google.com (mail-pg1-f175.google.com [209.85.215.175]) by ffbox0-bg.mplayerhq.hu (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2602868BD62 for ; Tue, 23 Jan 2024 11:05:26 +0200 (EET) Received: by mail-pg1-f175.google.com with SMTP id 41be03b00d2f7-517ab9a4a13so3200699a12.1 for ; Tue, 23 Jan 2024 01:05:26 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ob-encoder-com.20230601.gappssmtp.com; s=20230601; t=1706000722; x=1706605522; darn=ffmpeg.org; h=to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=xAAGXSB8SDVE1Qst2ZQtbQP2mNRO42T0H+UGV5n3eQg=; b=1jJ4q99GW9lHR8m6TRo5ndHemh65QY31DEP5pE4HlwCYtwKYU2bwc5QJQG+aiVE2yD hALCkaAkym+0BFMxZZAFDzfiUjU3gtNxwi7L7KkRY97rtyg4eIR2Xg5JlR6mSrgxVQGj wDeUiQWQCWXsOgpWvLDkqXw4sMTERm03mn3TO1QkyYXK9MfVM4oFKg8bMEmHD/TEIxBD Jr0R2DvDNGelE1pATkL1miBS6/lJBQd2r37g1zeaO/e48vFY705GZjNGuO+7ugvHLIcA Q6eNfG0ep/gqeln4Prk/d0f76citckUqzNM1jUneUctoc6O49Eji6Z0sD78k9B8graa7 QFeg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1706000722; x=1706605522; h=to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=xAAGXSB8SDVE1Qst2ZQtbQP2mNRO42T0H+UGV5n3eQg=; b=h+1/DLdIWqxgHnaLfvqLQd4iS0Vqdt7d18D4T9DWK+dDWFJ79u+/elIRfpJtqvS60n Bmh6krQuQQKWeEzGXHniFPi52SpByIzAcoovqb1rpryCyCoCmqzONIX0hOe12ZPGNOdU ZGwlf5BPYAKYj5TgqbVgllogJHrD2bHtQUKsLSp4cVW9xkvVwObM4Pz/1dbUOrgzo5Y8 nk5PpTOUgLCBAssRfhMloWU1Xq9RLyyW6S6flUgBVAF/DuQvM3HZ3RRtYo4B48qbFj/Y 2bLuksBYdYgkBuWEpQ5ZKhW3TObOaPoJJqRkMeYzNLH6GLwVVwchvrvc+SYwb/RezFj+ 6wIw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yx3lm7/5SGlu/49wjYDvhOosv8jAfjCNaZnFUVptLpB87l7I0Zk EtECegURaQgf7xLu/TFwSWBS/hZ1/50ZknYwmVEl74TyZyljrifWn3iPdAX24YKQheIjVrwPdWJ GtEG2J5QyKbRTsZoNtpEenkgsM6Uat3D/nR7QfdeKFpZrbEFiC9s= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IETf3KnyxPy3AtE+Ztw+zpeuMSuoNpF8N1LLIF6p1jl71WpU6clIPhYnd/2YtnG4BQoghfrcJE+bGsZN9aiDSc= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6a20:6f9c:b0:19a:788a:1c6a with SMTP id gv28-20020a056a206f9c00b0019a788a1c6amr6923289pzb.79.1706000722237; Tue, 23 Jan 2024 01:05:22 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20240123064948.455-1-ffmpeg@gyani.pro> <701ee720-c82e-4149-ae2a-a8d75b70f349@gyani.pro> In-Reply-To: <701ee720-c82e-4149-ae2a-a8d75b70f349@gyani.pro> From: Kieran Kunhya Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2024 09:05:10 +0000 Message-ID: To: FFmpeg development discussions and patches X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.29 Subject: Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH 1/2] avcodec/s302m: enable non-PCM decoding X-BeenThere: ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: FFmpeg development discussions and patches List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: FFmpeg development discussions and patches Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: ffmpeg-devel-bounces@ffmpeg.org Sender: "ffmpeg-devel" Archived-At: List-Archive: List-Post: On Tue, 23 Jan 2024 at 08:33, Gyan Doshi wrote: > > > On 2024-01-23 01:26 pm, Kieran Kunhya wrote: > > On Tue, 23 Jan 2024 at 06:50, Gyan Doshi wrote: > > > >> Set up framework for non-PCM decoding in-place and > >> add support for Dolby-E decoding. > >> > >> Useful for direct transcoding of non-PCM audio in live inputs. > >> > > Does this handle a Dolby E packet spanning multiple S302M packets? I'm > not > > saying you should support this as it's rare and very annoying to > implement > > but it does happen. > > No, this does not handle spanned payload. > I have access to a sample where it looks like the packetizer got > mis-aligned and I think > cases like those are better handled by a parser. > > Adding support for multiple payload packets in one 302m packet is on my > to-do although > the parser is better suited for that as well as the last payload packet > might be fragmented. > > Regards, > Gyan > Yes, and the other uncertainty is that the PTS must be cotimed with the video so you have to guess whether it's the previous PTS or the next one. Kieran _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-devel-request@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".