From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from ffbox0-bg.mplayerhq.hu (ffbox0-bg.ffmpeg.org [79.124.17.100]) by master.gitmailbox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9664E498A2 for ; Tue, 20 Feb 2024 21:56:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [127.0.1.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ffbox0-bg.mplayerhq.hu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 65C0168D0DD; Tue, 20 Feb 2024 23:56:53 +0200 (EET) Received: from mail-pj1-f44.google.com (mail-pj1-f44.google.com [209.85.216.44]) by ffbox0-bg.mplayerhq.hu (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 87BDC68CCB5 for ; Tue, 20 Feb 2024 23:56:47 +0200 (EET) Received: by mail-pj1-f44.google.com with SMTP id 98e67ed59e1d1-290d59df3f0so5204125a91.2 for ; Tue, 20 Feb 2024 13:56:47 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ob-encoder-com.20230601.gappssmtp.com; s=20230601; t=1708466205; x=1709071005; darn=ffmpeg.org; h=to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=4Gc4l4e1J1mZ1lDQdZdFyj+ZEmnxhwlVjK43LbFapdY=; b=lVwM411/8P9RIO7RKXWDBJUV3JX7xwzlxM5OPTAX1WcUwmAB328kMY9b+gMC1RTqwB rVQn+HeaHryfZaExuWbmQfHHf6MYL8TBbv+j4Be41Mc1dVWBOFJ5+IIK218PimE6RlGX uNjraowLPg+U52jQkpM5DWBMgePA2IPOKz/Iem1N3MAN85maS0Gu+WuDM2CZxTCiIgCg 3FmBOJ4c+G0jiVBwGtf6iGeHJP+JVE3jCRwC97r6af24A0fcVPEMNS2FwzFYt8xDzosO e0CZB9GdQMxOPLcdA0yQld1M9bhs7NOnfipU24w44Dv0EQdSFLX6C7i3qL8HFiplTEBr 8Ciw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1708466205; x=1709071005; h=to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=4Gc4l4e1J1mZ1lDQdZdFyj+ZEmnxhwlVjK43LbFapdY=; b=ZPLIEDm8LjnJtPzyh60lEHzbOE4HHBezkKy2+gPptzlqiPyaMZa9cJTb5N/ecpCR5O mf8sgT16qvAQozJC3mr1AnfR2YD/pm/ygdJn2TOL3q+HlfU2MWSptrIQ9ruboVc5gLvy fqo2p0KGwyPM4OtPRCbMdOPhaRUS7jH1+O5Y7qXP3mFofFbJ+lwzIaflsVBIFUQEsa1X QIsD41we7Aj9w9ynY3am+syQ79mThe1PD0B6SS784sbD1VkYoNluC2cAuh7HSID6K71H U0vFy/bicdi6FZRaq9MQ3CbrnOP+x7vEpWbA905ZyLK0R3Pj5b4TTS+pIMvix1/gGdgf ObXQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Ywb4pqIO1ULebXIiGdrR08ZiyMnl717ndO8xgN56iWzX5SgUoTY 5+metbdOLPGrtykYJDY8FcwmddwgZJlXEV6Kd3BEl8KPdniqiBMkKY/V0Ivw8wQbZ6q9kRjKPr+ XbivGfJkGfo3TcxwNsUYrpDEgZ31aj38tYk7oN8XTVjrOBBj+ X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IFe1mewLH774jR0y0NHwpEKQIgb2/AWtuzOAOyxgiiVxVyGPR0qOmfsFEytLoZTomUyIA91MSJif8dYiE8v2AM= X-Received: by 2002:a17:90a:77c3:b0:298:c118:c3d1 with SMTP id e3-20020a17090a77c300b00298c118c3d1mr14916070pjs.22.1708466204682; Tue, 20 Feb 2024 13:56:44 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <170807419472.21676.17214572018161936192@lain.khirnov.net> <6a46373c-3a6b-4490-9ae9-46d2a72a3e5a@gyani.pro> <170817255879.21676.17805665941049439864@lain.khirnov.net> <170819974399.21676.13449065399578350362@lain.khirnov.net> <20240218004314.GM6420@pb2> <170828044320.21676.10142270056126999587@lain.khirnov.net> <20240218223439.GP6420@pb2> <170837863557.27417.16524845266170993956@lain.khirnov.net> <20240220213917.GV6420@pb2> In-Reply-To: <20240220213917.GV6420@pb2> From: Kieran Kunhya Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2024 21:56:32 +0000 Message-ID: To: FFmpeg development discussions and patches X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.29 Subject: Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH 1/2] avcodec/s302m: enable non-PCM decoding X-BeenThere: ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: FFmpeg development discussions and patches List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: FFmpeg development discussions and patches Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: ffmpeg-devel-bounces@ffmpeg.org Sender: "ffmpeg-devel" Archived-At: List-Archive: List-Post: > > i disagree > > A TC member who wants to block a patch and wants to decide if a patch > should be > blocked is in the same situation as > > a Judge who wants to sue someone and wants to judge that someone. > Whilst I am not getting into a whole philosophical legal discussion about this (to follow on from last month's Nobel Prize winning mailing list lectures on economics and business). This isn't the same thing. The TC is more like a jury where a juror can have an opinion and their opinion can be swayed by arguments during private jury discussions. The TC is doing this for the good of the project (I hope) and not to push their own agenda and it's very clear in this case there is no personal agenda. Regards, Kieran Kunhya _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-devel-request@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".